S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
A. Sagunthala – Appellant
Versus
Rajathi – Respondent
ORDER :
The Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 10.08.2022 passed in I.A.No.370 of 2018 in O.S.No.3 of 2011.
2. The revision petitioner is the defendant and the respondent instituted a Suit for Specific Performance.
3. The revision petitioner/defendant remained absent and the Suit decreed ex-parte. Based on the ex-parte decree, the respondent/decree holder filed Execution Proceedings. After a lapse of about eight (8) years, the revision petitioner/defendant filed Interlocutory Application in I.A.No.370 of 2018 in O.S.No.3 of 2011 to condone the delay of 2755 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex-parte decree.
4. The Trial Court considered the grounds raised by the revision petitioner/ defendant to condone the delay of 2755 days and dismissed the petition mainly on the ground that the revision petitioner/defendant has not explained the delay nor adduced any material evidence to substantiate the same.
5. The revision petitioner/defendant in her affidavit, has stated that she has never received summons in the Suit, whereas the revision petitioner/ defendant in her proof of affidavit dated 15.02.2019, has stated that the respondent/plaintiff has obt
N. Balakrishnan versus M. Krishnamurthy
Ram Nath Sao @ Ram Sahu & Others versus Gobardhan Sap & Others
C. Subraniam versus Tamil Nadu Housing Board rep. by its Chairman And Managing Director
Kandaswamy and four others vs. Krishnamandiram Trust, Karur, by its Trustees and 33 others
Postmaster General and others vs. Living Media India Limited and another
Ramlal and others vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd.
Ajit Singh Thakur Singh and anr. vs. State of Gujarat (1981) 1 SCC 495
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.