SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1264

R. N. MANJULA
S. Govindarajan – Appellant
Versus
P. Natarajan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:N. Sathish Babu, Advocate. For the Respondent:S. Elangovan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code r/w Order 41 Rules 1 and 2 of C.P.C, against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.80 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Court, Dindigul, dated 22.08.2017)

1. This Appeal Suit has been preferred challenging the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Judge, Dindigul, dated 22.08.2017 in O.S.No.18 of 2014. The appellant is the defendant.

2. The plaintiff has filed the suit for specific performance based upon a registered sale agreement dated 18.09.2012 executed between the plaintiff and the defendant for a sale consideration of Rs.12,00,000/- (Rupees twelve lakhs only) in respect of the suit property. It is alleged that a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakhs only) was paid as an advance amount on the date of the sale agreement itself and two years time period was agreed for paying the balance sale consideration of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only) and get the sale deed registered. The plaintiff was all along ready and willing to perform his part of contract by paying the balance amount of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only); on 13.07.2014, he issued a legal not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top