M. Govindasamy(died) vs N. Muthusamy(died)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3792

P. VELMURUGAN
M. Govindasamy(died) – Appellant
Versus
N. Muthusamy(died) – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr.s.Madhavan
For the Respondent: Mr.R.Devaraj

JUDGMENT :

PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.54 of 2004, dated 31.3.2007, on the file of District Judge, Karur.

The Appeal Suit is directed against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.54 of 2004, dated 31.3.2007, on the file of District Judge, Karur.

2. The appellants 1 to 3 are the defendants and the deceased first respondent was the plaintiff in O.S.No.54 of 2004, on the file of District Judge, Karur. The respondents/Plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance against the appellants/defendants. After trial, the trial Court found that the respondents/plaintiffs are entitled to get the relief of specific performance and decreed the suit. Challenging the said judgment and decree passed by the trial Court, the present appeal suit has been filed.

3. The brief facts of the plaint reads as follows:

The appellants 1 to 3 herein are the defendants. The first defendant is the father of the second and third defendants. As per the partition deed, dated 3.9.1987, the suit properties belongs to the defendants. The defendants in the suit agreed to sell the suit properties to the plaintiff for a sale con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document