SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1495

S. KANNAMMAL
G. Sampath – Appellant
Versus
K. Shankari – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:T. Srinivasa Raghavan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1& R3, No Appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Appeal against the judgment and decree, dated 17.12.2009, passed in O.S.No.2750 of 2008 on the file of VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.)

1. This Appeal Suit is preferred against the judgment and decree, dated 17.12.2009, made in O.S.No.2750 of 2008 on the file of VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. Second defendant in the suit is the appellant herein and the plaintiffs in the suit are the respondents 1 to 3 herein.

3. Suit was one for partition of the Plaint 'A' and 'B' Schedule properties by dividing the same by metes and bounds into seven equal shares and deliver possession of one such share to the plaintiffs; for a direction to the defendants 1 and 2 to render accounts in respect of the rental collection from the Plaint 'A' and 'B' Schedule properties from 01.01.2008 and further to direct the defendants 1 and 2 to pay to the plaintiffs 1/7th share from the rental collection and for costs.

4. The case of the respondents/plaintiffs, as per the plaint, was as under:

4.1. One late P.Ganesan, grandfather of the plaintiffs, had married one Manickammal and they had seven children. Defendants 1 and 2 are the sons and defendants 3 to 5 are the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top