IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. SIVAGNANAM, J.
Mahalakshmi - Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi & Others - Respondent
W.P(MD).No. 9009 of 2022
Decided On : 07-06-2022
CCTV Footage - Preservation - The court directed the respondents to preserve the CCTV footages recorded on specific dates and at specific premises based on the petitioner's representation, emphasizing the importance of the footage in adjudicating the issue.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to preserve CCTV footage recorded at specific premises on specific dates, as the footage was crucial to prove her case of harassment by police officials.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the CCTV footage to be important in adjudicating the issue and directed the respondents to preserve the footage as requested by the petitioner, ultimately disposing of the writ petition.
Issues: Preservation of CCTV footage, harassment by police officials, importance of evidence in proving the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the importance of the CCTV footage as crucial evidence in adjudicating the issue raised by the petitioner.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to preserve the CCTV footages recorded on specific dates and at specific premises, ultimately disposing of the writ petition without imposing any costs.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to preserve the CCTV Footage recorded on 06.04.2022 and 07.04.2022 at the Venkateswara Clinic, Selvam Tea stall, One Kumaran Sweets store, Anandham Cloth Store, Aanda Jewellers, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 23.04.2022, within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.
1. This Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of Mandamus, seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 4 to preserve the CCTV Footage recorded on 06.04.2022 and 07.04.2022 at the Venkateswara Clinic, Selvam Tea stall, One Kumaran Sweets store, Anandham Cloth Store, Aanda Jewellers, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 23.04.2022.
2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had purchased a second hand car bearing Registration No.TN 45 AF 9145, from the Kaleeswari Finance. On 05.04.2022, one Karthick, who is a friend of the petitioner, borrowed the petitioner's car and also returned it on the same day. Again, the said Karthick has taken the car by using fake car key, without her permission. After that, the petitioner has taken the car in her custody. Then, one Selvam, who is the Sub Inspector of Police informed her that Karthick has lodged a complaint against her and asked her to hand over the car key. Subsequently, she gave the car key to the said Sub Inspector of Police. On 06.04.2022, the police officials attached to the Kellarajakularaman Police Station, forcibly taken the petitioner to Sankarankovil Bus stand and kept her in their illegal custody, harassed her and asked the car. In the said bus stand, Venkateswara Clinic and Selvam Tea Stall are situated and the buildings are installed with CCTV camera. Hence, her presence may be recorded in the said CCTV cameras. Further, he stated that they dropped her at Gandhi Statue, Rajapalayam, where One Kumaran Sweets Store, Anandham Cloth Store and Aandal Jewelers are situated and the buildings are also installed with CCTV cameras. Hence, the petitioner sent a representation to the respondents and requested to initiate legal action against the police officials, who harassed her. But, till now no action has been taken. Thereafter, the petitioner has requested the owners of the above said buildings, but, they informed that the CCTV Footages will be provided only on the request of the police officials. He further submitted that the respondents 1 to 4 may be directed to preserve the CCTV Footages, which are recorded on 06.04.2022 and 07.04.2022 at the above said premises, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 23.04.2022. Further he stated that the CCTV Footages are very important to prove the case and also apprehends that the footages recorded may be destroyed.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents also admitted that there are CCTV footages, which are recorded on 06.04.2022 and 07.04.2022..
4. Considering the importance of the CCTV footage to adjudicate the issue involved in this case, the respondents 1 to 4 are directed to preserve the CCTV footages recorded on 06.04.2022 and 07.04.2022 at Venkateswara Clinic and Selvam Tea Stall, Kumaran Sweets Store, Anandham Cloth Store and Aandal Jewelers.
5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
AI
Preservation of crucial evidence, such as CCTV footage, can be mandated through a writ of mandamus when it is deemed important in adjudicating an issue.
The person directly involved in a case should approach the relevant authority for the preservation of evidence, and the authority should consider the request on its own merit.
The court emphasized the necessity to preserve evidence relevant to a criminal case pending in lower courts.
The court may issue a writ of mandamus directing the police to preserve evidence if it is relevant to the fairness and thoroughness of an ongoing criminal investigation.
State authorities are legally obligated to preserve and provide copies of CCTV footage from police stations and relevant public areas upon request, pursuant to established Supreme Court guidelines on....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.