IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.M. VELUMANI, S. SOUNTHAR, JJ.
K. Muthuvel @ Joswa - Appellant
Versus
M. Priya - Respondent
C.M.A. No. 1741 of 2020 & C.M.P. No. 12822 of 2020
Decided On : 20-06-2022
Divorce Act - Interim Maintenance - Section 10(x) of Indian Divorce Act - [Section 10(x)] - The court considered the income of the appellant, the allegations made by both parties, and the evidence presented, and modified the interim maintenance amount to Rs.5000 per month.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, husband, filed for dissolution of marriage under Section 10(x) of the Indian Divorce Act. The respondent filed an application claiming interim maintenance and litigation expenses. Both parties made allegations against each other, but no oral or documentary evidence was presented.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellant's income was a matter of dispute, and the evidence presented by the appellant led to a modification of the interim maintenance amount to Rs.5000 per month.
Issues: Dispute over the appellant's income, allegations made by both parties, lack of evidence presented by either party.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the evidence presented by the appellant regarding his income to modify the interim maintenance amount.
Final Decision: The appellant was directed to pay Rs.5000 per month as interim maintenance to the respondent till the disposal of the Original Petition. The Family Court was directed to dispose of the Original Petition within six months.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 55 of the Divorce Act 1869 to set-aside the fair and decreetal order dated 01.02.2020 in respect of granting interim maintenance to the respondent in I.A.No.698 of 2018 in I.D.O.P.No.22 of 2017 on the file of the Family Court, Erode.)
V.M. Velumani, J.
1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 01.02.2020 passed in I.A.No.698 of 2018 in I.D.O.P.No.22 of 2017 on the file of the Family Court, Erode.
2. The appellant is husband, who filed I.D.O.P.No.22 of 2017 on the file of the Family Court, Erode under Section 10(x) of Indian Divorce Act for dissolution of Marriage celebrated on 14.09.2017 between the appellant and the respondent-wife. Pending said Original Petition, the respondent filed an application in I.A.No.698 of 2018 claiming interim maintenance of Rs.15,000/- and Rs.50,000/- towards litigation expenses.
3. According to the respondent after marriage, due to attitude of appellant and his family members, the matrimonial life was not happy. The appellant took the respondent to her parents house on 06.12.2017 with a promise that he will come and take her after two days. The appellant did not do so, but filed I.D.O.P for dissolution of marriage. The respondent made various averments on merits of I.D.O.P. She further stated that she was working as a teacher and after marriage, she resigned the job, she is without income and depending on the income of her father, who is a carpenter, a daily wager. The appellant is a B.E.(E.E.E.) graduate and is working as an Assistant Professor in Nandha College of Technology, Erode and is earning Rs.40,000/- per month and prayed for interim maintenance of 15,000/- per month and litigation expenses of Rs.50,000/-.
4. The appellant filed counter affidavit and denied all the averments made by the respondent. The appellant made various averments on merits of the claim in I.D.O.P. In addition to that, he also stated that he is unemployed and he is not working as Assistant Professor in Nandha College of Technology, Erode and not earning Rs.40,000/- per month as alleged by the respondent. According to the appellant, the respondent is working as a teacher and has sufficient means to maintain herself and meet out the litigation expenses and prayed for dismissal of the application.
5. Before the learned Judge, Family Court, Erode, both the appellant and the respondent did not let in any oral or documentary evidence.
6. The learned Judge, Family Court, Erode, considered the fact in marriage Invitation filed by the appellant in I.D.O.P, wherein it has been stated that appellant is M.E. graduate and working as Assistant Professor, in Nandha College of Technology, Erode. Taking note of this fact, fixed monthly income of the appellant at Rs.30,000/- and directed the appellant to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/ per month as interim maintenance and permitted the respondent to withdraw Rs.10,000/- deposited by the appellant towards litigation expenses.
7. Against the said order, the appellant has come out with the present appeal.
8. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant reiterated the averments made in the counter affidavit and submitted that the learned Judge failed to appreciate the fact especially that the respondent is working as a teacher, earning Rs.20,000/- per month and she is capable of maintaining herself . The Tribunal, without granting opportunity to the appellant, directed the appellant to pay the interim maintenance and hence, prayed for setting aside the order of the Tribunal.
9. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant further submitted that as per the order passed by this Court on 24.11.2020, the appellant has deposited 50% of the arrears of maintenance, which comes to Rs.1,40,000/- by way of Demand Draft vide D.D.No.730466, dated 31.12.2020 and he continued to pay 50% of the interim maintenance, as ordered by this Court.
10. Though notice has been served on the respondent and her na
The court's decision on the interim maintenance amount was based on the evidence presented regarding the appellant's income.
The duty of parents to provide for the child's educational expenses justified the order for interim maintenance.
The husband's liability to maintain his wife and child and the objective of granting interim/permanent alimony to prevent destitution or vagrancy.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for evidence to support claims for interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the court's authority ....
Misrepresentation of employment status can affect entitlement to maintenance, and special circumstances such as the needs of a special child can influence the amount of maintenance awarded.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to consider the income of the parties and the paying capacity of the non-applicant when deciding the quantum of interim maintenance under ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.