SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2920

C. SARAVANAN
Transtonnelstroy-Afcons JV, Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Chairperson, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:D. Balamurugan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the 1st respondent in MSCFC/CR/364/19, MSCFC/CR/365/19, MSCFC/CR/367/19, MSCFC/CR/406/19, MSCFC/CR/407/19 dated 23.11.2021 and quash the same.)

1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent all dated 23.11.2021. The case of the petitioner appears to be that copy of the claim petition filed by the 2nd respondent before the 1st respondent on 23.11.2019 was not served.

2. That apart, it is submitted that the entire principal amount was settled by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent during the pendency of the proceedings before the 1st respondent after completion of the work by the 2nd respondent on 06.12.2021.

3. It is further submitted that it was incumbent on the part of the 1st respondent to either conciliate the dispute between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent by itself or by referring the matter a centre providing such services and one its failure to take up the case for arbitration by itself or by referring the matter a centre providing such services. It is therefore

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top