IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J.
S. Senthil Kumar - Appellant
Versus
M/s. Thiruvalluvar Transport Corporation Employees Co-operative Credit Society, Represented by its Secretary, Chennai & Others - Respondent
W.P. No. 16723 of 2018 & W.M.P. No. 19917 of 2018
Decided On : 18-08-2022
Writ Petition - Loan Repayment - Court directs respondents to re-examine records and return original documents to petitioner
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner pledged property for a loan, repaid the entire amount, and requested the return of original documents. The respondent society allegedly sent back the documents, but the petitioner claimed non-receipt.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the facts did not clearly establish whether the documents were received by the petitioner. It directed the respondents to re-examine their records and confirm the status of the documents.
Issues: Dispute over the return of original documents pledged as security for a loan
Ratio Decidendi: The court could not issue a positive direction based on disputed facts, and therefore directed the respondents to re-examine their records to confirm the status of the documents.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the Writ Petition by directing the respondents to re-examine their records and return the original documents to the petitioner. The petitioner was also given the option to obtain a duplicate copy from the Sub Registrar Office.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the seventh respondent in impugned sale notice dated nil and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to return the petitioner's original sale deed pledged with the first respondent society.)
1. This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the seventh respondent relating to the impugned sale notice dated nil and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to return petitioner's original Sale Deed pledged with the first respondent society.
2. The petitioner joined as a Clerk in the respondent Society on 04.06.2003. In 2010, the petitioner pledged his property comprised in S.No.496 of Mugappair Village, bearing Plot No.6/486, J.J.Nagar West, Mogappair, Chennai – 600 037, for a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- towards Employees Housing Building Loan. It appears that the petitioner repaid a sum of Rs.6,75,000/- during the period from 03.08.2010 to 31.10.2017 as monthly instalments and thereafter, defaulted in repayment of balance amount.
3. Therefore, the first respondent issued a letter dated 24.04.2018 to the petitioner, wherein, it has been stated as follows:-
We hereby proceed to take necessary action to recover the loan amount of Rs.4,77,906 (Principal – Rs.1,25,000, Interest – Rs.3,52,906) owed to us at par with the Absolute Assignment of Title Deed to the undersigned of the schedule mentioned property. We demand your imminent response for repayment of loan default within three days from the date of receipt of this letter.
Failing which, the Society shall recover your loan through the extract of the absolute assignment of title deed executed by you to the society and complete the entire process with due legal procedure.
4. Thereafter, the petitioner has deposited the entire balance amount of Rs.4,78,500/- in the society account vide Canara Bank Cheque No.930506, on 08.05.2018 towards full and final settlement of Employees House Building Loan. The petitioner, vide letters dated 09.05.2018 & 22.05.2018, requested the respondent society to send the original documents/sale deed along with original receipt for the payment of Rs.4,78,500/- and No Due / Loan Closure Certificate, to the petitioner.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has repaid the entire loan amount, the first respondent has not returned the original documents. It is submitted that without returning the original documents, the first respondent appointed the seventh respondent Sales Officer to sale the property of the petitioner in an auction and sent an emissary and pasted a sale notice dated nil. It is therefore prayed for quashing the sale notice dated nil and for a direction to the respondent society to return the original documents of the petitioner.
6. Opposing the prayer, the learned counsel for the firs respondent submits that in response to the petitioner's letter dated 09.05.2018, the first respondent has issued a letter dated 15.05.2018 to the petitioner enclosing all the original documents including the original sale deed. According to the respondent Society, all the documents were returned to the petitioner' residential address with acknowledgement card by way of registered post.
7. The learned counsel for the first respondent submits that the petitioner if advised can invoke the alternate jurisdiction before the Arbitrator under the provisions of Multi State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984.
8. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the first respondent.
9. The facts on record do not clearly bring out whether the documents were indeed received by the petitioner from the respondents. The documents which were allegedly sent back to the petitioner are the originals which are pledged as Security with
AI
The court emphasized the need to confirm the status of disputed documents before issuing a positive direction.
Court enforces bank's assurance to retrieve and return original sale deed from DRT to property purchaser.
Borrower entitled to mortgaged document release post-loan repayment; lender may pursue recovery separately.
The court emphasized the responsibility of the second respondent to release mortgage documents for which loan amounts have been repaid by members, despite the lack of privity of contract.
A borrower is entitled to the return of mortgaged documents upon full payment of the loan amount, reinforcing the legal obligation of lenders to return such documents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.