SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3184

P. N. PRAKASH, R. HEMALATHA
District Collector, Sivagangai – Appellant
Versus
K. R. Kanimozhi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:A.K. Manikkam, Special Government Pleader. For the Respondent:M. Natarajan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent seeking to set aside the order dated 18.11.2021 passed in W.P. (MD) No.10605 of 2014.)

P.N. Prakash, J.

1. This intra-Court appeal has been preferred calling into question the legality and validity of the order dated 18.11.2021 passed by a learned single judge of this Court in W.P. (MD) No.10605 of 2014.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rank in the instant intra-Court appeal.

3. The District Collector, Sivagangai and the Child Development Project Officer, Singampunari are the appellants.

4. Before the learned single judge, the respondent was not present. Therefore, when this intra-Court appeal came up, we directed issuance of notice to her and she appeared before us on 29.06.2022. When asked whether she requires any assistance, she expressed her opinion in the affirmative. Accordingly, she engaged a counsel and contested the appeal.

5. In the writ petition, the respondent had challenged the order dated 29.05.2014 passed by the first appellant, besides seeking a direction to the f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top