SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3306

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
M. Balasubramaniam – Appellant
Versus
Rajalakshmi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. These applications have been filed seeking for the following reliefs:-

a) for a direction to the respondents, their men, agents, employees, agents, servants, managers, permitted assigns, successors in interest and all other persons claiming through or under them or otherwise howsoever, to furnish details of the deposits, fixed deposits etc. including bank account number, fixed deposit details, date of the fixed deposits, withdrawals, adjustments, if any, etc. are made by and in the name of late Mr.P.M.Maruthai Chettiar, pending disposal of the suit;

b) for a direction to the respondents 1 to 7, their men, agents, employees, agents, servants, managers, permitted assigns, successors in interest and all other persons claiming through or under them or otherwise howsoever, to deposit 3/5th (1/5th for each of the legal heirs) of the monies already withdrawn by them from the deposits of late Mr.P.M.Maruthai Chettiar into this Hon'ble Court, as detailed in the Schedule to the Plaint and the affidavit, pending disposal of the suit;

c) for an interim injunction restraining the respondents 1 to 7, by themselves, their partners, men, servants, agents, representatives, assig











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top