SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3458

S. SOUNTHAR
S. P. Moorthi – Appellant
Versus
P. Subramanian – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Jim Raj Milton, Advocate. For the Respondent:R. Thiyagarajan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in R.L.T.A.No.8 of 2021 in R.L.T.O.P.No.20 of 2019 on the file of the learned III Additional City Civil Court at Chennai.)

1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order of eviction passed by the learned Rent Court.

2. The respondent/landlord filed the petition for eviction under Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act (TNRRRLT Act). The respondent/landlord sought for eviction on the ground of failure to enter into a written agreement as required under the Act [Section 21(2)(a)] and also default in payment of rent [Section 21(2)(b)]. The respondent/landlord in his petition averred that the demised premises was let out to the Revision Petitioner in the year 2011 for a monthly rent of Rs.10,000/- and he failed to pay the rent from July 2018. It was also specifically averred by the respondent/landlord that both the petitioner and the respondent had failed to enter into a written tenancy agreement as mandated by Section 4(2) of TNRRRLT Act and hence sought for eviction.

3. The Revision Petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top