SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 337

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
R. Jayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
S. Kumaresan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. T. Gowthaman for Mr. U. Gokulakrishnan.

ORDER :

[Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order of the Principal District Munsif, Erode dated 23.08.2022, returning the unnumbered RLTOP bearing CFR.No.2798 of 2022 (F.No.346 of 2022).]

1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the order passed by the Principal District Munsif, Erode dated 23.08.2022, returning the unnumbered R.L.T.O.P bearing C.F.R.No.2798 of 2022 (F.No.346 of 2022).

2. The revision petitioner is the landlord, who instituted eviction proceedings under Section 21(2)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017, on the ground that no agreement exists between the landlord and tenant. Thus, the respondent/tenant is liable to be evicted.

3. The Rent Court returned the petition on the ground that the revision petitioner/landlord had permitted the respondent to occupy the premises owned by revision petitioner/landlord, after the enforcement of Tamil Nadu Act, 42 of 2017 and thus, the tenancy agreement in writing is mandatory under Section 4 of the Act, which is admittedly not available in the petition.

4. The learned Senior Counsel appear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top