R. Kalaivani vs S. Krushnan - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 94

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Mad) 94

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
R. Kalaivani – Appellant
Versus
S. Krushnan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M. Vijayan, K. Kulandaivelu.
For the Respondent: S. Vijayakumar.

ORDER :

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of The Constitution of India against the order dated 20.10.2022 passed in M.P. No. 2 of 2022 in RLTOP No. 139 of 2021 by the learned Judge, XIV Small Causes Court, Chennai.

1. The Civil Revision Petition has been instituted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 20.10.2022 passed in M.P. No. 2 of 2022 in RLTOP No. 139 of 2021. The revision petitioner is the land lord, who instituted the petition in RLTOP No. 139 of 2021 to evict the respondent/tenant from the said premises on the ground that the revision petitioner has not entered into an agreement with the respondent/tenant. The petition was filed under Section 21(2)(a) of the TN Act 42 of 2017.

2. The grievance of the revision petitioner is that during the pendency of rent control proceedings, the respondent/tenant has not paid the admitted monthly rent of Rs. 70,000/-.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner is a divorced woman and depending on the rental income for leading her livelihood. Since the respondent/tenant has not paid the rent for the past about fourteen months from the month of December 2021 to till date,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document