Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Non-Compliance on Counter Affidavits Draws Exemplary Costs Warning: Supreme Court in Gauri Maulekhi PIL
13 Mar 2026
SLPs Challenging PoP Idol Immersion Orders Disposed as Infructuous; Liberty to Assist Bombay HC: Supreme Court
13 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
R. Vijayakumar – Appellant
Versus
Thiru. Shiv Das Meena I. A. S. Secretary to Government – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
Prayer : Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 05.04.2018 in W.P.No.7986 of 2018 passed by this Court.
The Contempt Petition is filed to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 05.04.2018 in W.P.No.7986 of 2018 passed by this Court.
2. This Court directed the respondents to reconsider the case of the writ petitioner within a period of four months and the petitioner has not pursued the orders vigilantly. Now after a lapse of about four years ten months, he cannot file a contempt petition for the purpose of punishing the respondents.
3. When the petitioner himself has not seriously pursued the orders passed by this Court, the respondents at this length of time cannot be punished by invoking the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act, since the contempt petition is to be filed within a period of one year as per the provisions of the Contempt of the Co
The High Court emphasized that contempt applications must be filed within one year of the alleged contempt, adhering to statutory limitations while asserting selective exercise of inherent powers onl....
The limitation prescribed under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act cannot go against the constitutional mandate contained in Article 215 of the Constitution. The court emphasized that the mere ....
Any contempt proceedings initiated must comply with the one-year limitation period stipulated under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, barring exceptional circumstances.
Contempt of court conviction requires proof beyond reasonable doubt; courts have inherent power to ensure justice, unaffected by procedural timelines in cases of fraud.
The Supreme Court reaffirmed that contempt proceedings are subject to strict limitation periods, and the concept of a continuing wrong does not apply to single acts of non-compliance with court order....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article