Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
G. Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
Minor S. Sruktheksha, Rep. by her guardian and mother, S. Abirami – Respondent
ORDER :
[Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the petition and order dated 22.09.2022 made in I.A.SR.No.2529 of 2022 in O.S.No.140 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the II Additional District Judge, Salem.]
1. The civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 22.09.2022 passed in I.A.SR.No.2529 of 2022 in O.S.No.140 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the II Additional District Judge, Salem.
2. The revision petitioner is the 1st defendant and the respondent, instituted a Suit for partition. Written statement was filed on 21.01.2019 itself. The Suit was posted for cross-examination of PW1 and some of the defendants attained majority and amendment petitions were also filed and pending. The Trial Court made a finding that the present Suit is the oldest case pending on the file of II Additional District Court, Salem and after a lapse of long years from the institution of the Suit, the revision petitioner has filed an Interlocutory Application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Trial Court made a finding in paragraph 7 of the plaint that the detailed cause of action h
Courts have the authority to set aside orders and direct specific actions in civil revision petitions. Emphasis on expeditious disposal of suits.
The court affirmed that unless a restraint order is in place, a trial Court can entertain applications for passing a final decree even if an appeal or review is pending.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
