HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
The Principal cum Public Information Officer, Loyola College (Autonomous), Chennai - Appellant
Versus
The State Chief Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Represented by its Assistant Registrar, Chennai & Others - Respondents
WP No. 41149 of 2016 & WPMP No. 35145 of 2016
Decided On : 31-03-2023
Right to Information Act - Violation of Natural Justice - Quashing of Order
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, Principal cum Public Information Officer of Loyola College, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Tamil Nadu Information Commission dated 08.10.2016, alleging violation of procedures under the Right to Information Act, 2005.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was not afforded the opportunity to defend their case as per the provisions of the Right to Information Act, and the unilateral decision by the Commission violated the principles of natural justice. The Commission conceded that the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.
Issues: Violation of procedures under the Right to Information Act, 2005 and denial of opportunity to defend the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the order of the Tamil Nadu Information Commission was quashed and remanded for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need to follow the procedures as contemplated and afford an opportunity to all parties, including the petitioner.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the order of the Commission was quashed. The matter was remanded back to the Commission for fresh adjudication, allowing the petitioner to raise all grounds, including maintainability. No costs were awarded.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the first respondent-Commission vide case No.SA 9384/D/2016 dated 08.10.2016 (as signed), quash the same. [Prayer amended vide order of Court dated 10.11.2022 made in WPMP N.29262 of 2022 in WP No.41149 of 2016].)
1. The order dated 08.10.2016 passed by the first respondent-Tamil Nadu Information Commission, is under challenge in the present writ petition.
2. The petitioner is the Principal cum Pubic Information Officer, Loyola College (Autonomous), Sterling Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600034, filed the present writ petition mainly on the ground that the Tamil Nadu Information Commission had passed the impugned order dated 08.10.2016, which is directly in violation of the procedures contemplated under the Right to Information Act, 2005.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner mainly contended that no opportunity was granted to the writ petitioner to defend their case in the manner contemplated under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
4. The petitioner was deprived of submitting their defence on the issues and thus the unilateral decision taken by the Tamil Nadu Information Commission, is in violation of the principles of natural justice.
5. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Tamil Nadu Information Commission is unable to establish that an opportunity was afforded to the writ petitioner and therefore, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Tamil Nadu Information Commission fairly made a submission that the matter is to be remanded back for fresh adjudication.
6. In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Tamil Nadu Information Commission, the order impugned passed by the Tamil Nadu Information Commission in proceedings No. No.SA 9384/D/2016 dated 08.10.2016 (as signed) is quashed and the matter is remanded back to the first respondent-Tamil Nadu Information Commission for fresh adjudication by following the procedures as contemplated and by affording an opportunity to all the parties. The petitioner is entitled to raise all the grounds raised in the present writ petition, including the maintainability point.
7. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
AI
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the procedures and principles of natural justice under the Right to Information Act, 2005, and held that denial of opportunity to defend the case wa....
The show cause notice issued by the Information Commission was not a final decision, and the petitioner should be provided with an opportunity to defend his case in accordance with the Right to Infor....
The right to information includes assistance for those unable to access documents independently.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.