HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J. NISHA BANU, J.
G. Kannan - Appellant
Versus
Indian Institute of Technology, Represented by the Chairman, Chennai - Respondent
W.P. No. 7951 of 2015
Decided On : 12-04-2023
Voluntary Retirement - Pensionary Benefits - G.O.Ms.No.470, CCS Pension Rules - [FACT OF THE CASE] This writ petition seeks to quash the rejection of the petitioner's request for voluntary retirement and to direct the respondent to grant pensionary and gratuity benefits. [FINDING OF THE COURT] The court found that the petitioner's request for voluntary retirement was belated and dismissed the writ petition. [ISSUES] The issues revolved around the petitioner's eligibility for voluntary retirement and the delay in filing the petition. [RATIO DECIDENDI] The court held that the petitioner's request for voluntary retirement was untimely and lacked merit due to laches. [FINAL DECISION] The writ petition was dismissed.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent contained in letter dated 25.03.2015 issued by the Dean, IIT Madras, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to treat the petitioner as a person voluntarily retired after having completed more than twenty years of combined qualifying service and hence, grant all consequential pensionary and gratuity benefits due to the petitioner.)
1. This writ petition is filed seeking to quash the letter dated 25.03.2015 issued by the Deputy Registrar (Admn.) IIT Madras, whereby, the petitioner''s request for considering voluntary retirement has been rejected. The petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondent to treat him as a person as voluntarily retired, after having completed more than twenty years of combined qualifying service, and to grant all consequential pensionary and gratuity benefits due to the petitioner.
2. It is averred in the writ petition that the petitioner was employed as Programmer Grade-I in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering of the Indian Institution of Technology, Madras (hereinafter referred to as, “IIT”). In order to take up an assignment in a teaching consulting capacity with M/s.Data Software Research Co. Ltd. at New Zealand, the petitioner had applied for leave for a period of two years with effect from 17.06.1985.
3. Considering the petitioner''s request, the respondent agreed to grant leave Ex-India, Ex-ordinary leave (without pay and allowance) for a period of one year with effect from 17.06.1985 to 16.06.1986, on condition that no extension of the said leave shall be allowed, unless prior request made by the petitioner to extend the leave is accepted by the respondent. 4. It is submitted that while granting leave to the petitioner, the respondent has also stated that if the petitioner fails to return to duty, on the expiry of the aforesaid leave, then, the petitioner shall be deemed to have resigned from his post at the Institute, unless he opts to retire under the Scheme of retirement, in vogue, in the Institute. Pertaining to the same, an undertaking was signed by the petitioner on 10.06.1985.
5. The petitioner''s submission is that the petitioner was relieved from his duties on the afternoon of 14.06.1985. On 04.07.1986, the petitioner had sent a letter to the Director, IIT Madras, seeking for extension of the previously sanctioned period of one year leave to two years. The Deputy Registrar accepted the petitioner''s request and issued a letter dated 06.08.1986, granting extension of leave, subject to the execution of fresh undertaking by the petitioner.
6. The petitioner executed the undertaking on 13.08.1986 and he was granted leave for two years with effect from 17.06.1985 to 16.06.1987 on the basis of the afore-stated conditions.
7. While so, the Deputy Registrar by letter dated 29.06.1987stated that the petitioner will be deemed to have resigned from his post, as he did not rejoin on expiry of the sanctioned period of 2 years leave.
8. On 01.07.1987, the petitioner sought for voluntary retirement. In response to the same, an official order, dated 03.09.1987 was issued by the respondent stating that the petitioner was deemed to have resigned from his post in accordance with the earlier undertaking signed by him.
9. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that earlier the petitioner worked at PSG Polytechnic, Coimbatore from 25.06.1964 to 10.07.1965; as Junior Instructor from 18.08.1965 to 15.05.1971 and thereafter, he was permanently absorbed in IIT, Madras. As per G.O.Ms.No.470, dated 22.07.1982, there was an ongoing correspondence between IIT, Madras and the Directorate of Technical Education, Chennai under the Tamil Nadu Government, since 1983, regarding combining the services rendered by the petitioner at IIT, Madras and Department of Technical Education for the purpose of granting r
Pension eligibility cannot be claimed without meeting statutory service requirements and timely judicial action against employment decisions.
An employee if has attained the age of 50 years and has spent 20 years of service, he would be entitled to seek voluntary retirement and so consequential benefits
A government servant must complete 20 years of qualifying service under Rule 48-A of the Pension Rules to be eligible for voluntary retirement, with unauthorized leaves excluded from service calculat....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.