V.Usha, w/o. Vetrivel vs K.Sundarambal, w/o. L.Krishnaraj

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Mad) 740

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI
V.Usha, w/o. Vetrivel – Appellant
Versus
K.Sundarambal, w/o. L.Krishnaraj – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. G. Jeremiah Gregory John
For the Respondents: Mr. G. Ilamurugu

Table of Content
1. appeal filed to set aside lower court decision. (Para 1 , 2)
2. dispute over execution of sale agreement vs. loan transaction. (Para 3 , 4 , 12)
3. trial court's findings on evidence appreciation. (Para 5 , 6)
4. first appellate court's independent analysis of facts. (Para 7 , 8 , 10)
5. final conclusions drawn by appellate court. (Para 9 , 11 , 14)
6. evidence admissibility under section 92 of the indian evidence act. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
7. conclusions regarding genuineness of the sale transaction. (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGEMENT :

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The plaintiff / appellant has filed this appeal to set aside the judgment and decree made in AS No.2 of 2022 dated 16.03.2023 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Perambalur whereby the judgment and decree dated 01.04.2022 made in OS No.134 of 2016 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Perambalur, was reversed.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as they were ranked in the suit.

3. The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant seeking the relief of specific performance, alleging that the suit property belongs to the respondent/defendant, who had offered to sell the same for a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document