SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1054

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G. JAYACHANDRAN, K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JJ.
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Devasthanam, Madurai – Respondent
A.S. (MD) No. 312 of 2008, A.S. (MD) No. 13 of 2015, C.M.P. (MD) No. 1081 of 2017
Decided On : 03-04-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : R. Baskaran, V. Raghavachari, S. Manohar, V.R. Shanmuganathan.
For the Respondents: T.S.R. Venkatramana, S. Kandasamy.

Headnote:

Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882 - Section 4 - Madras Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 - Section 1(4) - Civil Procedure Code,1908 - Section 96 - Fast Track - Sessions Court - Appeals suit arising - Suit property - Claiming suit property - Possession and enjoyment of suit property - Extent and Assessment - Cultivable Land - Whether assessed or un-assessed with certain specific expectation - Held, There is no document to show how and when land was classified as Register been later re-classified as un-assessed waste land during settlement - Nevertheless larger interest of public and directions of Hon'ble Supreme Court to reclaim forest land and prevent deforestation ought to have been taken judicial notice by trial Court while considering suit more particularly when plaintiff/Temple has failed to substantiate their right to claim possession of suit land - Obviously in disputed land constructions and public buildings like schools nutrition hall etc been put up with road facility - Substantial extent of land still remains as jungle and never been possessed or enjoyed by Temple in any manner after - It is difficulty to countenance relief sought by Temple based on inam Fair Register prepared in year without any proof of continuity of enjoyment - Appeal Allowed.

JUDGMENT :

G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.

Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., to set aside the judgment and decree dated 12.03.2008 made in O.S.No. 560 of 2004 on the file Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No. III, Madurai.

Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 12.03.2008 made in O.S.No. 119 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No. III, Madurai.

1. These two appeals suit arising out of the judgments passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. III, Madurai, in respect of suit property Survey No. 1/1, Viralipatti village, Madurai District which is declared as reserved forest by the Forest Department. The proceedings of the Forest Department is resisted by Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Devasthanam, the plaintiff in O.S.No. 560 of 2004 claiming the suit property belongs to Temple donated by Thirumalai Nayakar as Devadayam and also by an Association by name “Sirumalai Thenmalai Malaithotta Vivasayigal Sangam”, the plaintiff in O.S.No. 119 of 2005, claiming that their members are in possession and enjoyment of the suit property.

2. The trial Court allowed both suits. Being aggrieved by that, the State through the Officials of the Forest Department are before this Court by way of an appeals in A.S.(MD).No. 312 of 2008 against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No. 560 of 2004 and A.S.(MD).No. 13 of 2015 against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No. 119 of 2005.

3. Before adverting to the Law and facts involved in these two Appeal Suits, for better appreciation it is profitable to know the background of the suit subject property which is in dispute.

4. The Inam Commissioner report under the British Government submitted during the year 1863 under the Register No. 75, Viralipatti village, Nilakottai Taluk, Madurai District says the land in S.No. 1/1 is a “Devadayam” (gifted to 'God'), given permanently in support of the Pagodas of Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Devasthanam, Thirumalai Nayakkar Kattalai at Madurai Town. The Survey number, Extent and Assessment been mentioned in the T.D.No. 1397 prepared by Inam Commissioner on 24.12.1863. The tenure of the said property is mentioned in the Inam Commissioner report as 'Permanent'. The land covering under Survey No. 1/1 been classified as Ayakar, Poramboke, dry land, cultivable land and waste dry land. The extent under each head also specified. This land is located on Western side of “Sriumalai Hills” which extents to nearly 22,000 acres. As far as the property now under consideration is located at Viralipatti village in S.No. 1/1 to an extent of 3009.84 acres forms part of Viralimalai West.

5. From 'Madura Country Manual” a report by J.H. Nelson, by the order of Madras Government and published in the year 1868, it could be understood that, Viralipatti village has been gifted to the Lord Meenakshi at Madurai by Thirumalai Nayakkar. There is enough reference about the charity of Thirumalai Nayakkars bestowing various land to 7 Temples in and around Madurai and particularly the land in Viralipatti Village permanently for Goddess Meenakshi in the Madura Country manual complied by J.H. Nelson. There is also Tamil literatures of Ancient and Medieval period referring about the Sriumalai hills.

6. In the Inam Fair Register, while referring the land in Viralipatty Village under register No. 75, it is noted that the whole of the Ayakar is dry as per fiscal account. The whole of the dry waste land measuring 418.71 acres being Anadi Tarisu or immemorial waste. This extent is situated at the bottom of the hills overgrown with jungle, but the Inam Commissioner has opined that half of the extent may be improved and cultivated. This comment appears to be common to the six villages covered under T.D.No. 1397.

7. After independence, o

                                                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                  1
                                                  2
                                                  3
                                                  4
                                                  5
                                                  6
                                                  7
                                                  8
                                                  9
                                                  10
                                                  11
                                                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                  supreme today icon
                                                  logo-black

                                                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                  Please visit our Training & Support
                                                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                  qr

                                                  Scan Me!

                                                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                  whatsapp-icon Back to top