KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Aapico Hitech Public Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sakthi Auto Component Ltd – Respondent
ORDER :
[PRAYER : Arbitration Original Petition is filed under Sections 47 & 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to declare that the Arbitration Award in SIAC Arbitration No.376 of 2019 dated 06.10.2021 be enforced as a decree of this Court, as against the respondent and for costs.]
This Arbitration Original petition has been filed dated 08.12.2021 under Sections 47 & 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 for enforcement and execution of the final Award passed by Foreign Arbitral Tribunal dated 06.10.2021.
2. In brivity, the 1st petitioner “Aapico Hitech Public Company Limited” is herein referred to as “Aapcio Thailand”; the 2nd petitioner “Aapico Investment Private Limited” as “Aapico Singapore” and the 3rd petitioner “Sakthi Global Auto Holdings Limited” as “SGAH” and the respondent, “Sakthi Auto Component Limited” as “SACL”.
3. The brief facts of the case are as follows :
3.2 Aapico Thailand holds 100% shares of Aapico Singapore and hence, Aapico Thailand and Aapico Singapore are collectively referred
Dropti Devi vs. Union of India
Gemini Bay Transcription (P) Ltd. v. Intergrated sales service Ltd
LMJ International Ltd v. Sleepwell industries Co. Ltd
Syed Askari Had Ali Augustine Imam v. State Delhi Admn.
India Household and Healthcare Ltd. v. LG Household and Healthcare Ltd.
Bhaurao Dagdu Paralkar v. State of Maharastra
Jai Narain Parasrampuria v. Pushpa Devi Saraf
Venture Global Engg. v. Satyam Computer Services Ltd.
Venture Global Engg. LLC v. Tech Mahindra Ltd.
Associate Builders v. DDA (2015) 3 SCC 49 : (2015) 2 SCC (Civ) 204
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.