BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
B. PUGALENDHI, J.
S. Stella Mary Rani – Appellant
Versus
The Director of School Education Department, Chennai & Others – Respondents
WP(MD)No. 5383 of 2021 & WMP(MD)Nos. 4298, 4299, 5842 of 2021
Decided On : 16-03-2023
Special Grade Pay - Teacher Appointment - G.O.Ms.No.992, Education Department, dated 22.06.1979 - A.Shanmugasundaram v. The Chief Educational Officer, Namakkal [2018 SCC OnLine Mad 2899] - Director of Elementary Education v. S.Jeyakumar [2017 SCC OnLine Mad 24483]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a teacher, sought Special Grade Scale of pay after being appointed in various educational institutions. The District Educational Officer rejected the request, citing incorrect pay fixation and ordered recovery of excess pay.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's service period in an aided institution should be counted for the purpose of Selection Grade Pay, as per G.O.Ms.No.992, Education Department, dated 22.06.1979, and upheld by relevant case law.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner's earlier service in an aided institution should be considered for the grant of Special Grade Pay.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that as per the Government Order and relevant case law, the petitioner's service period in an aided institution should be counted for the purpose of Selection Grade Pay, and the order rejecting the request was set aside.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the respondents were directed to count the earlier service rendered by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders fixing Special Grade Pay to her.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the fourth respondent in O.Mu.No. 2157/A3/2020 dated 20.06.2020 and quash the same and consequently, directing the fourth respondent to grant Special Grade Scale of pay to the petitioner, since 18.07.2017 and extend all attendant and other consequent benefits.)
1. The petitioner was appointed as a Secondary Grade Teacher on 01.07.1997 in an aided school and on completion of 10 years of service as Secondary Grade Teacher, she was provided with Selection Grade Pay. Thereafter, by the proceedings of the District Elementary Educational Officer, Thanjavur, dated 15.07.2009, she was appointed as Secondary Grade Teacher in a Panchayat Union Middle School. On completion of 20 years of service as a Secondary Grade Teacher, she applied for Special Grade scale of pay. The fifth respondent / Block Educational Officer has also recommended for Special Grade Pay by proceedings in Na.Ka.No.159/A1/2020 dated 24.02.2020. However the fourth respondent / the District Educational Officer vide his proceedings in O.Mu.No.2157/A3/2020 dated 20.06.2020 has rejected the request of the petitioner and as against the same, the present writ petition is filed.
2. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, by referring the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.992, Education Department, dated 22.06.1979, submitted that the Government has already issued directions that the services rendered by a Teacher under all kinds of Management, viz., Government, Panchayat Union, Municipal Corporation and aided agencies and also in and under the control of Director of Backward Classes and of Harijan and Tribal Welfare prior to his / her resignation, termination, transfer or migration should be counted for the required period of 10 years of service for the purpose of granting selection grade in that post excluding the period of breaks if any.
3. He further submitted that the above Government Order was upheld by this Court in A.Shanmugasundaram v. The Chief Educational Officer, Namakkal [2018 SCC OnLine Mad 2899] following the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Director of Elementary Education v. S.Jeyakumar [2017 SCC OnLine Mad 24483]. Similarly placed Teachers are enjoying the benefit of this Government Order and this petitioner alone has been discriminated and has been denied the benefits. Therefore, he prayed for appropriate orders.
4. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner was initially appointed in an aided School on 01.07.1997 and on completion of 10 years of service, she was awarded with Selection Grade on 19.07.2007. Thereafter, on 09.12.2009, she resigned her post and she was selected by the Teachers Recruitment Board and was posted as Secondary Grade Teacher in a Panchayat Union Elementary School. While fixing her pay in the new position, it was wrongly fixed in the Selection Grade, instead of the ordinary Scale of Pay, since the petitioner has resigned from her service, on her own willingness and as such, her earlier service period rendered in an aided School cannot be counted for the pay benefits. As per the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No 1289, Education Department, dated 18.06.1982, if a Teacher employed in any aided school is transferred and appointed on migration to another aided school, after getting prior approval of the appropriate authority of the department, such teacher will have to lose his seniority and he will be treated as a junior. Therefore, he prayed for dismissal.
5. This Court considered the rival submissions made on either side and also perused the materials placed on record.
6. The petitioner was initially appointed as Secondary Grade Teacher on 01.07.1997 and subsequently transferred to other aided institutions and she has also been provided with Selection Grade Pay after her competit
The main legal point established is that the service period in an aided institution should be considered for the grant of Special Grade Pay as per G.O.Ms.No.992, Education Department, dated 22.06.197....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to proper pay fixation based on past service in aided schools, as protected under FR 22(B) and G.O.Ms.No.367, and the violation ....
The main legal point established is the inapplicability of G.O.Ms.No.216 to the petitioner due to delay and laches, and the determination that the petitioner, working in a private aided school, was o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a petitioner who willingly joins Government service with knowledge of the salary conditions cannot later seek to fix the pay band granted in t....
Stale and belated claims cannot be entertained, and benefits as directed by a Full Bench order shall be extended only to parties before the Court, with no fresh writ petitions entertained after a spe....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to selection/special grade for government employees is based on stagnation in the same post without promotion for a certain pe....
The concept of granting selection grade and special grade should not be tampered with and that teachers are either eligible for promotion or for Selection/Special Grade, not both.
Teachers promoted as Primary School Headmasters after 01.06.1988 are entitled to receive monetary benefits based on their earlier service as Secondary Grade Teachers, as per the judgment in S.Chandra....
Resignation from a government service results in the forfeiture of previous service, as per Rule 41 of the Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Services, and pension benefits cannot be based on service r....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.