SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2231

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. SURESH KUMAR, V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, JJ.
The Government Of Tamilnadu Rep.by Secretary To The Government School Education Department, Fort St. George Chennai & Others – Appellants
Versus
K Ganesan & Others – Respondents
W.A. No. 37 of 2018 & C.M.P. No. 286 of 2018
Decided On : 05-07-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:N. Murali, Government Advocate For the Respondent:R. Saseetharan, Advocate.

Teachers promoted as Primary School Headmasters after 01.06.1988 are entitled to receive monetary benefits based on their earlier service as Secondary Grade Teachers, as per the judgment in S.Chandrasekaran's case.

Headnote:

PROMOTION - PAY RESTRUCTURING - W.P.No.12564 of 2015 - G.O.Ms.No.207, School Education Department, dated 30.09.2008 - The court discussed the issue of pay fixation and entitlement to monetary benefits for teachers promoted as Primary School Headmasters after 01.06.1988. The judgment in S.Chandrasekaran's case was referenced, where it was held that such teachers are entitled to receive monetary benefits pursuant to their Selection Grade / Special Grade pay fixation of Primary School Headmaster, besides the monetary benefit in respect of retiral benefits.

Fact of the Case:

The respondents, who were initially appointed as Secondary Grade Teachers and later promoted as Primary School Headmasters, were denied selection grade and special grade pay based on their earlier service as Secondary Grade Teachers, resulting in reduced pay and pension. They filed writ petitions seeking rectification of this anomaly.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the earlier order in S.Chandrasekaran's case allowed similar writ petitions, and no error was found in allowing the writ petitions filed by the respondent teachers. The writ appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.

Issues: The main issue was the entitlement of teachers promoted as Primary School Headmasters after 01.06.1988 to receive monetary benefits based on their earlier service as Secondary Grade Teachers.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the judgment in S.Chandrasekaran's case, which held that such teachers are entitled to monetary benefits pursuant to their Selection Grade / Special Grade pay fixation of Primary School Headmaster, besides the monetary benefit in respect of retiral benefits.

Final Decision: The writ appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer :Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.04.2015 in W.P.No.12564 of 2015.)

R. SURESH KUMAR, J

1. The respondents were initially appointed as Secondary Grade Teachers in the early 1970''s at Panchayat Union Elementary Schools at various places. After long years of service, they had been given promotion as Primary School Headmasters sometime in 1988.

2. In this context, it is to be noted that 01.06.1988, since was the cut off date, redesignation was made and the pay has been re-structured for various posts like Secondary Grade Teachers and Primary School Headmasters. In respect of these private respondents are concerned, since they retired from service after getting promotion after the cut off date ie., 01.06.1988, selection grade and special grade was not given by taking into account their earlier service as Secondary Grade Teachers.

3. Had the said service period been considered, certainly these people would have earned higher pay by conferring the status of selection grade and special grade. However, since they have been promoted in the meanwhile, the earlier service had not been taken into account for the purpose of conferring selection grade and special grade. With the result, there has been a lesser pay fixed and correspondingly, pension also had been reduced.

4. Therefore, in order to set right this anamoly, the respondent Teachers approached this Court and filed writ petition in W.P.No.12564 of 2015. Similar writ petitions in W.P.Nos.12563 and 12565 of 2015 were filed by other teachers similarly placed like the respondents. All the writ petitions were taken up together and the writ Court passed a common order on 27.04.2015.

5. In the said order the learned Judge, having considered the earlier order passed on the very same issue in W.P.No.25001 of 2012, was pleased to allow those writ petitions also. Aggrieved over the said order passed by the writ Court, the present appeal has been preferred.

6. Heard Mr.N.Murali, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr.R.Saseetharan, learned counsel for the respondents.

7. We have noticed that in fact the learned Judge, having taken note of the earlier order passed by this Court in W.P.No.25001 of 2012, has allowed those writ petitions. If we look at the earlier order that was passed in W.P.No.25001 of 2012 reported in 2015  (5) Law Weekly 140 in the matter of S.Chandrasekaran and Others -vs- The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep.by Secretary to the Government, School Education Department and Others, a detailed discussion had been taken, where the issue has been discussed threadbare and ultimately the writ petitions filed by the persons similarly placed like the respondents herein, were allowed by the learned Judge.

8. In the said judgment in S.Chandrasekaran''s case, the learned Judge has taken note of the fact that already similar issue was considered in W.P.No.20706 of 2010, where a batch of writ petitions were allowed by order dated 05.08.2011 and this factor has been taken into account by the learned Judge in Para 27 of the said judgment in S.Chandrasekaran''s case, which reads thus,

" 27. This Court allowed the aforesaid writ petitions in W.P.Nos.20706 of 2010 etc., batch on 05.08.2011 and quashed the proceeding of the Director of Elementary Education dated 23.07.2010 and held that the persons, who were promoted as Primary School Headmasters after 01.06.1988 are entitled to receive monetary benefits pursuant to their Selection Grade / Special Grade pay fixation of Primary School Headmaster, besides the monetary benefit in respect of retiral benefits. Para 6 and a passage in Para 7 of the said judgment are extracted hereunder:

"6. In all these matters, the petitioners had served as Primary School Headmasters and retired from service. It is seen from the perusal of the G.O.Ms.No.207, School Education Department, dated 30.09.2008 that for the persons, who have been appointed as Primary School Headmaster

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top