SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1438

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Sri Gayathri Agencies, Represented by its Proprietor – Appellant
Versus
The State Tax Officer, Salem Town (West) Assessment Circle – Respondent
W.P. No. 5750 of 2023 & W.M.P. No. 5747 of 2023
Decided On : 01-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Senniappan, Advocate. For the Respondent:V. Prasanth Kiran, Government Advocate.

Violation of principles of natural justice as per Section 75(4) of the GST Act 2017 led to the quashing of the assessment order and the remand of the matter for fresh consideration.

Headnote:

Natural Justice - Assessment Order - The court quashed the assessment order for the assessment year 2017-18 under the GST Act 2017 due to the violation of principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not granted personal hearing, which is mandated by Section 75(4) of the GST Act 2017.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the assessment order for the assessment year 2017-18 under the GST Act 2017, citing violation of principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not granted personal hearing.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that no personal hearing was afforded to the petitioner in the assessment proceedings, which is contrary to Section 75(4) of the GST Act 2017. As a result, the court quashed the assessment order and remanded the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration, with the direction to adhere to the principles of natural justice, including granting the petitioner the right of personal hearing.

Issues: Violation of principles of natural justice due to the lack of personal hearing in the assessment proceedings under the GST Act 2017.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the violation of Section 75(4) of the GST Act 2017, which mandates personal hearing in cases where an adverse decision is taken by the Assessing Officer against the assessee.

Final Decision: The court quashed the assessment order dated 31.10.2022 for the assessment year 2017-18 and remanded the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration, with the direction to adhere to the principles of natural justice, including granting the petitioner the right of personal hearing.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of the respondent in GSTIN:33ABCPT7686AIZL/2017-18 dated 31.10.2022 and quash the same as being without jurisdiction and authority of law and contrary to the principles of natural justice.)

1. This writ petition has been filed, challenging the assessment order dated 31.10.2022 passed in respect of the assessment year 2017-18 under the GST Act 2017.

2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not granted personal hearing in the impugned assessment proceedings. Section 75(4) of the GST Act 2017 mandates personal hearing to be given to the assessee if any adverse decision is taken against the assessee in the assessment proceedings.

3. Admittedly, in the impugned assessment order, an adverse decision has been taken against the petitioner, which is the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition.

4. On the last hearing date, this Court directed the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent to get instructions as to whether personal hearing was granted to the petitioner in respect of the impugned proceedings, pertaining to the assessment year 2017-18. On instructions, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submits that no personal hearing was afforded to the petitioner in respect of the assessment year 2017-18.

5. Section 75(4) of the GST Act 2017 makes it clear that in cases, where an adverse decision is taken by the Assessing Officer against the assessee, personal hearing is mandatory. Admittedly, in the assessment proceedings, pertaining to the assessment year 2017-18, no personal hearing was afforded to the petitioner. This being the case, on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice as the impugned assessment order has been passed contrary to Section 75(4) of the GST Act 2017, which mandates personal hearing, the impugned assessment order dated 31.10.2022, pertaining to the assessment year 2017-18 has to be quashed and the matter has to be remanded back to the respondent for fresh consideration, on merits and in accordance with law.

6. For the foregoing reasons, the impugned assessment order dated 31.10.2022 passed in respect of the assessment year 2017-18 is hereby quashed and the matter is remanded back to the respondent for fresh consideration, on merits and in accordance with law. The respondent shall pass final orders, after adhering to the principles of natural justice, including granting the petitioner the right of personal hearing.

7. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected W.M.P. stands closed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top