SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2400

SUNDER MOHAN
Padmini – Appellant
Versus
Gunaraj – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:T.S. Arthanareeswaran, Advocate. For the Respondents:R2, M/s. A. Salomi, Advocate, R1 & R3, No Appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 18.08.2021 in M.C.O.P.No.575 of 2018 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Sessions Judge, Special Court for trial of cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Namakkal.)

1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed for enhancement of compensation granted by the Tribunal in the award dated 18.08.2021 made in M.C.O.P.No.575 of 2018 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/ Sessions Judge, Special Court for trial of cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Namakkal.

2. The appellants are claimants in M.C.O.P.No.575 of 2018 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Sessions Judge, Special Court for trial of cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Namakkal. They filed the said claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.40,00,000/- as compensation for the death of one Rinash, who died in the accident that took place on 01.01.2017.

3. According to the appellants, on the date of accident i.e., on 01.01.2017 at about 12.30 a.m., while the deceased was riding his two wh




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top