Back
G. JAYACHANDRAN
N. Balasubramanian Chennai – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, CBI/SPE/ACB, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., pleased to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.1/1998 pending before the Principal Special Judge for CBI/13th Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai and quash the criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner and pass such further or other orders as this Hon''ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.)
1. Petition filed to quash the proceedings pending before the 13th Additional Sessions Court, (Special Court for CBI case), Chennai in C.C.No.1/1998.
2. The petitioner the Tapal Clerk in Customs Office is ranked as 4th accused in the said criminal prosecution launched against M/s.Ballarpur Industries Ltd and 5 others in F.I.R.No.RC17/(A)/95 dated 06.04.1995 was registered based on source information. The final report filed on 29.12.1997 after completing the investigation. The trial Court, on considering materials collected, has framed charges, which is self explanatory and disclosed relevant facts necessary to decide this quash petition. Therefore, the charges are extracted below:-
Firstly that, during 1993-1994 at Chennai deceased
The court ruled that if a petitioner is exonerated in a departmental inquiry on merit, the same allegations cannot be prosecuted further in criminal proceedings due to the higher standard of proof re....
If the exoneration in the departmental proceedings is on merits and the allegations are found to be not sustainable, the criminal prosecution on the same set of facts cannot be allowed to continue.
Timeliness and adherence to rules in disciplinary proceedings are critical; undue delays can lead to quashing of charge sheets.
The court established the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to an abuse of the process of law when the accused had already been exonerated in the departmental enquiry o....
Exoneration in departmental proceedings does not automatically quash criminal proceedings, which must be determined based on evidence in court.
Statements of co-accused are relevant but not sufficient for establishing a charge in absence of independent evidence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
