A. Sethuraman vs A. Radhakrishnan - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 2603

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2603

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
A. Sethuraman – Appellant
Versus
A. Radhakrishnan – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:S. Madhavan, Advocate. For the Respondent: No appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 06.02.2007 in A.S.No. 93 of 1998 on the file of the Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court IV), Periyakulam reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 21.07.1998 in O.S.No.86 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakkanur.)

1. The appellant is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.86 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakkanur. The respondents are the defendants in the above suit.

2. The suit was filed by the appellant / plaintiff seeking for permanent injunction restraining the respondents / defendants and their men from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property.

3. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit scheduled property originally belonged to one Vadamalu Servai and his minor sons. Vadamalu Servai on his behalf and on behalf of his sons, sold the property to the plaintiff by virtue of sale deed Ex.A1, dated 17.01.1969. Since the plaintiff was minor at that time, the plaintiff''s grandmother purchased the property as a guardian of the plaintiff. Aft

Click Here to Read the rest of this document