Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN
State represented by The Superintendent of Police – Appellant
Versus
Durai Murugan – Respondent
COMMON ORDER
These Criminal Revision Cases have been filed by the State to set aside the order of discharge passed by the Special Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Vellore in Cr.M.P.Nos.1674/2006 to 1678/2006 in Special Case No.1 of 2004, dated 23.02.2007.
Gist of the prosecution case:
2 Petitioner in Crl.RC.No.265 of 2013 namely D.Durai Murugan/A1 was the Minister of Public Works and Forest Department, Government of Tamil Nadu during the period between 13.05.1996 and 14.05.2001. He is a member of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly elected from Katpadi Constituency from 15.05.2001 and he is a 'public servant' within the meaning of Section 2 (C) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (herein after referred to as "P.C. Act") from 13.05.1996.
2.1 Petitioner in Crl.RC.No.266 of 2013 namely D.Santhakumari/A2 is the wife of the Public Servant. Petitioner in Crl.RC.No.267 of 2013 namelyl Kadir Anand/A3 is the son of the Public Servant. Petitioner in Crl.RC.No.268 of 2013 namely K.Sangeetha/A4 is the wife of A3. Petitioner in Crl.RC.No.269 of 2013 namely Durai Sinigaram/A5 is the brother of the Public Servant and he is a retired employee of a private company.
2.2 On the basis of in
A public servant and abettors can be tried together for possession of disproportionate assets without a satisfactory account of their sources, under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Public servants must account for assets acquired beyond known lawful income, with the burden of proof resting on them, confirming the significance of established evidential standards in corruption ca....
Discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C. requires consideration of whether a prima facie case exists; trial court's scrutiny of evidence is improper at this stage.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the charge can be framed based on the possibility of the commission of a crime, even if the case is based on circumstantial evidence. The Cour....
In assessing disproportionate assets, a public servant's family's income and expenditures can be included for determining asset accumulation.
The court ruled that a special judge's discharge finding is flawed if it performs a mini trial rather than evaluating evidence for the basis of accusations, necessitating a trial.
The necessity of proper evidence evaluation at trial for substantiating income claims in disproportionate assets cases, distinguishing the limited scope of revisional power concerning discharge decis....
At discharge stage, prima facie evidence must indicate a case exists; defence matters cannot be thoroughly examined until trial. Abetment can include non-public servants aiding corrupt conduct.
At the discharge stage, a court assesses the prosecution's evidence on its face value to determine if there are grounds to proceed with trial, without full examination of evidence.
The court must consider all relevant income sources and documents before framing charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act, ensuring a fair evaluation of the accused's financial status.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
