SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Ashutosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through CBI – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
All these three cases are arising out of same FIR, however, discharge and charge orders are different and in view of that, all these cases are being heard together with consent of the parties.
2. Heard Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned A.S.G.I., appearing for the CBI.
3. In all these petitions, the prayer is made for quashing the orders dated 12.08.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi in connection with R.C. Case No.17(A)/2016-R registered for the offences under Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, whereby, discharge petitions filed under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioners have been rejected. The prayer is also made for quashing the order dated 21.11.2022 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVII cum Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi, whereby charges have been framed against the petitioners under Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
4. The FIR was lodged alleging therein that the petitioner-Ashutosh Kumar was worki
Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel v. State of Gujarat and another
State of Tamilnadu v. R. Soundirarasu and others
Jagan M. Seshadri v. State of T.N.
N. Ramakrishnaiah v. State of A.P.
State of M.P. v. Awadh Kishore Gupta
Sajjan Singh v. State of Punjab
State of Maharashtra v. Wasudeo Ramchandra Kaidalwar
Munna Devi v. State of Rajasthan
Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency (P) Ltd. v. CBI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.