2024 Supreme(Mad) 198
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J.
Praveen Manavalan, M/s. Pearl Community One Developers Private Limited,Represented by his Power of Attorney Agent, Chennai - Appellant
Versus
Represented by its Managing Director- Maurius Anton Chrislyn Cardoza, Bengaluru - Respondent
Arb. O.P. (Com.Div.) No. 428 of 2023 & Arb. Appln. No. 418 of 2023 & Application No. 6172 of 2023
Decided On : 04-01-2024
For the Petitioner:M/s. D. Ferdinand, Advocate. For the Respondent:N. Alagu Narayanan for M/s. RRN Legal, Advocate.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes between the parties in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Headnote:
Arbitration - Appointment of Arbitrator - The court appointed an arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Fact of the Case:
The court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the petitioner and the respondents in terms of the Memorandum of Agreement dated 30.03.2023.
Finding of the Court:
The court deferred the order on the original petition and appointed an arbitrator, stating that there is an arbitrable dispute between the parties. The appointed arbitrator was directed to resolve the dispute and pass an award expeditiously.
Issues: Appointment of Arbitrator, Relief under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Venue for Arbitration
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that there was an arbitrable dispute between the parties and appointed an arbitrator to resolve the dispute in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Final Decision: The court appointed an arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the parties and directed them to work out the remedy before the appointed arbitrator. The original petition and related applications were disposed of with no costs.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Original Petition is filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to appoint an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondents in terms of the Memorandum of Agreement dated 30.03.2023 and to direct the respondent to pay costs.)
1. Already connected proceedings in Arb.O.P.(Com.Div)No.427 of 2023, an Arbitrator has been appointed and liberty has been given to the petitioner herein to move appropriate application for the relief sought for in Arb.Appln.No.419 of 2023 and A.No.6173 of 2023.
2. The order in the present Original Petition was deferred while passing the order on 23.11.2023 wherein an Arbitrator was appointed. An objection was raised earlier by the respondent stating that time for payment by the guarantor has not arisen and therefore the order to be passed in the present petition did not arise in absence of a cause of action. Since no payment has been made before the due date, it is to be construed that there is an arbitrable dispute between the parties and therefore the parties can be relegated to work out the remedy before the same Arbitrator who was appointed in Arb.O.P.(Com.Div)No.427 of 2023.
3. Consequently, Mr.P.Giridharan, Advocate (Ms.No.1418/2007) (Mobile No.:98846 72733) residing at Vanguard House, 3rd Floor, No.48, Second Line Beach, Parrys, Chennai – 600 001, is appointed as an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent.
4. It is open for the applicant to press for relief covered in Arb.Appln.No.418 of 2023 under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner is also entitled to press for such an interim relief against the guarantor as well before the learned Arbitrator. The respondent is also entitled to move appropriate application for protecting its rights.
5. The learned Arbitrator appointed herein, shall after issuing notice to the parties and upon hearing them, endeavour to complete the arbitral proceedings and pass an award strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of twelve months after the date of completion of pleadings under Sub- Section 4 to Section 23 as is contemplated in Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without getting influenced by any of the observations made by this Court in this order.
6. The learned Arbitrator appointed herein shall be paid fees and other incidental charges as may be fixed with the consent of parties or in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the same shall be borne by the parties equally. In case, the respondent remain ex parte, the petitioner shall pay the entire fee and other incidental charges to the Arbitrator and later recover the same from the respondent.
7. The parties are at liberty to workout the venue for Arbitration at Chennai.
8. The Original Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. Consequently Arbitration Application No.418 of 2023 and Application No.6172 of 2023 are also closed. No costs.
9. Since the Court has appointed an Arbitrator, it is open to the petitioner as well as the respondent to seek other reliefs under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the learned Arbitrator.