SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3093

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.M. VELUMANI, V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, JJ.
K. Saravanan, Sole Proprietor of MVN Bricks, Coimbatore - Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Industries Department, Chennai & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. Nos. 34307, 34312, 34316, 34320, 34793, 34796 of 2022, 1206, 1211, 1215, 1214, 1218, 1220, 1222, 1258, 1263, 1265, 1271, 1264, 1269, 1276, 1280, 1268, 1273, 1279, 1282, 1286, 1288, 1292, 1297, 1299, 1304, 1300, 1305, 1309,1310, 1312, 1464, 1466, 1469, 1812, 1816, 1817, 1819, 1818, 1864, 1869, 1873, 1865, 1870, 1874, 1996, 2000, 2005, 2003, 2013, 2018, 2023, 2027, 2038, 2019, 2032, 2035, 2037, 2039, 2055, 2059, 2062, 2349 & 2358 of 2023 etc & W.M.P. Nos. 33769, 33776 & 33780 of 2023 etc.
Decided On : 27-04-2023

For the Appearing Parties :S. Parthasarathy, Senior Counsel for Suhrith Parthasarathy, Dr. T. Seenivasan, Spl. Government Pleader, J. Ravindran, Addl. Advocate General IX, Assisted by Shanmugavalli Sekar, Standing Counsel, M.R. Gokul Krishnan, A. Selvendran, Spl. Government Pleader, N. Murali Kumaran, Senior Counsel for M/s. McGAN Law Firm, R. Hari Krishnan, N. Sridhar for R. Bharathkumar, Richardson Wilson, Advocates.

Headnote:

Environment Protection Act - Brick Kiln Operations - Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the jurisdiction of the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and the application of the Central Pollution Control Board's methodology for assessing environmental compensation and action plan. The court also highlighted the violation of principles of natural justice and the need for a reasoned order by the TNPCB.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the challenge to orders passed by the Chairman, TNPCB, regarding the closure of illegal brick kilns in Coimbatore District. The petitioners were involved in the manufacture of bricks without obtaining necessary consent to establish or operate their brick kilns under relevant environmental statutes. Proceedings were initiated before the court and the National Green Tribunal (NGT) South Zone. The NGT directed the TNPCB to assess damages caused by the illegal brick kilns.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Chairman, TNPCB, had the jurisdiction to levy damages/penalty/compensation under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. However, the court held that the TNPCB must strictly follow the methodology given by the Central Pollution Control Board's In-house Committee for assessing environmental compensation and action plan. The court also emphasized the violation of principles of natural justice and the need for a reasoned order by the TNPCB.

Issues: The issues included the jurisdiction of the Chairman, TNPCB, the application of the Central Pollution Control Board's methodology for assessing environmental compensation, and the violation of principles of natural justice in the TNPCB's proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Chairman, TNPCB, had the jurisdiction to levy damages/penalty/compensation under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. However, the TNPCB must strictly follow the methodology given by the Central Pollution Control Board's In-house Committee for assessing environmental compensation and action plan. The court also emphasized the violation of principles of natural justice and the need for a reasoned order by the TNPCB.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the TNPCB to follow the Central Pollution Control Board's methodology for assessing environmental compensation, provide a reasoned order, and ensure the assessment of damages is conducted from the date of commencement of operation by the individual brick kiln until the date of closure by the District Collector, Coimbatore. The court dismissed a related miscellaneous petition, allowing the petitioner to approach the Committee in terms of CPCB Guidelines 1.3.2.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer in W.P.No.34307 of 2022:-Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in proceedings No.T2/TNPCB/F.24093/Brick kiln/82/CBN/2019, dated 25.07.2022 and all proceedings in furtherance thereof, including but not limited to the order passed by the 3rd respondent in Proceedings No.T2/TNPCB/F.24093/Brick Kiln/82/CBN/ Directions/2019, dated 06.12.2022 and to quash the same as arbitrary, unjust and illegal.)

Common Order:

V. Lakshminarayanan. J.

1. These writ petitions challenge the orders passed by the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB). The orders are more or less identical and hence, all the writ petitions are disposed of by this common order.

2. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petitions are: The petitioners were involved in the manufacture of bricks. They were conducting their business in Coimbatore District. It is on record that none of the petitioners had obtained consent to establish or consent to operate their brick kilns under the relevant environmental statutes. Complaints were received against the illegal brick kilns being operated at Thadagam Valley. Proceedings were initiated before this court as well as before the National Green Tribunal (NGT), South Zone at Chennai. The proceedings were initiated in O.A.No.119 of 2021 by the NGT South Zone. Insofar as the writ petitions concerned before this court in W.P.No.27356 of 2019 and W.P.No.28475 of 2019, reliefs that were sought was for protection of Elephant Corridor in the District of Coimbatore and for closure of illegal brick kilns at Chinna Thadagam, Nanjundapuram, Veerapandi, Somayapalayam and Pannimadai Villages of Coimbatore District, respectively. A relief was also sought for the constitution of a committee to assess the damages.

3. By orders dated 06.01.2021 and 10.02.2021, the First Bench of this Court in W.P.Nos.23756 & 28475 of 2019 directed the appropriate authorities to take action against the brick kilns, which were operating illegally or without any licence. Originally, closure orders were passed by the Tahsildar concerned on 19.03.2021 along with the District Environmental Engineer, and the Assistant Director of Geology and Mining. This order dated 19.03.2021 was challenged before this Court in a batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.9606 of 2021, etc. This Court, by its order held that the proper authority is the District Collector of Coimbatore and therefore, set aside the orders passed by the aforesaid three authorities dated 19.03.2021. This court directed the District Collector, Coimbatore, to pass orders after hearing the affected parties. Pursuant thereto, the District Collector of Coimbatore had ordered closure of 185 illegally operating brick kilns.

4. On 13.06.2021, the District Collector, Coimbatore, directed the closure of the brick kilns. In the mean time, the NGT, South Zone, initiated a suo motu case in O.A.No.119 of 2021. The NGT constituted a joint committee comprising of the District Collector, a member from the Tamil Nadu State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, District Environmental Engineer, TNPCB, a member of the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), and the Regional Director of Geology and Mining. This committee was directed to personally inspect the areas and submit a report and a report was also submitted. Since action was initiated by the NGT (South Zone), W.P.No.28475 of 2019 was dismissed directing the parties to approach the NGT for assessment of damages. In turn, by order dated 13.05.2022, NGT (South Zone) directed the authorities to determine the damages that had been caused on account of 185 illegally run brick kilns. This order was passed on that very day, the Joint Committee filed a report before the NGT. Within a couple of months, the Chairman, TNPCB, issued notices in exercise of the powers delegated to him under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 calling upon the n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top