SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3205

R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SENTHILKUMAR
K. Kailasamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
N. Indiradevi – Respondent


For the Appellant :P. Valliappan, Senior Counsel, S.M.S. Shriram Narayanan, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1, G. Arivarasan, R2, Dr. C. Ravichandren, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Appeal suit has been filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the I Additional District Court at Coimbatore, dated 03.04.2017 in OS. No.20 of 2015.)

R. Subramanian, J.

1. The first defendant in OS No.20 of 2015 assails the decree for partition granted by the Trial Court by way of this Appeal.

2. The said suit was initiated by one of the daughters of Kandhasamy, who died on 13.08.1965 leaving behind his wife Lakshmiammal, two daughters viz. Vijayalakshmi and Indiradevi, the second defendant and the plaintiff in the suit respectively, and Kailasamoorthy, the first defendant/appellant herein. It is not in dispute that Lakshmiammal died in 1997. The other defendants are the alienees from the first defendant, after 09.09.2005 viz. the date on which the Hindu succession Amendment Act 39 of 2005, came into force.

3. The plaintiff laid the suit primarily contending that the suit properties were ancestral Properties belonging to the joint family consisting of Kandhasamy, herself and defendants 1 and 2.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top