Back
RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
Prakasha, S/o. Muddumadegowda – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka, Through Kavalande Police Station, Mysore Dist, Rep. By State Public Prosecutor High Court Of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Ramachandra D. Huddar, J.) :
Appellant-accused has preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the judgment of his conviction dated 12.06.2014 and order of sentence dated 17.06.2014 passed in Sessions case No.78/2011 by VII Additional Sessions Judge, Mysuru.
2. Parties to this appeal are referred to as per their rank before the trial Court for convenience.
3. That accused who was charge sheeted by the Circle Inspector of Police, Nanjangud Circle in Crime No.179/2010 of Kowlande Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 417 and 376 of IPC.
4. That the victim girl filed a complaint before the Sub-Inspector, Kowlande Police Station, Nanjangud Taluk on 28.11.2010 at 8.30 p.m. by appearing before the Police Station alleging that she is the resident of Tagaduru Village, she was in love with her neighbour i.e., Prakash S/o Muddumadegowda (accused) for the last two years prior to filing of the complaint. It is alleged that for the last six months prior to filing of the complaint, he started cheating her. She used to inform him stating that because of that she is facing problems in her education. It is alleged that with an assurance to marry her, forcibly without hearin
Consent in sexual relations must be informed and voluntary; mere promise of marriage does not constitute grounds for rape if the relationship is consensual.
When a charge for a major offence is not made out, conviction for a minor cognate offence, even in absence of a charge, can be sustained.
Consent given under a false promise of marriage is not considered valid consent, and the distinction between rape and consensual sex must be carefully examined based on the active and reasoned delibe....
The judgment underscores the necessity for corroborative evidence in sexual assault cases and the principle that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution to establish guilt beyond a reasonable d....
In rape cases, victim's testimony must be credible and reliable; inconsistencies can undermine a conviction.
Rape and cheating – Moral indignation cannot take place of legal proof that cohabitation of parties was on the basis of a dishonest representation of appellant.
The conviction for rape under Section 376 IPC was overturned due to insufficient evidence of lack of consent and significant doubts raised by the circumstantial evidence.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that consent under fear or misconception is essential to establish the offence of rape, and the court's analysis of the victim's consent and act....
The absence of physical injuries does not negate a credible victim's testimony in rape cases, which can be sufficient for conviction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
