Back
V. SIVAGNANAM
K. B. George – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by The Labour Enforcement Officer (Central), Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to the case in C.C.No.101 of 2020 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpet, now Chengalpet District and set aside the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence passed on 09.06.2022
1. Challenging the impugned Judgment dated 09.06.2022 passed in C.C.No.101 of 2020 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpet, Chengalpet District, the present criminal revision case has been filed.
2. The fact of the case is that the petitioner/accused No.1 is in Indian Railway Traffic Service (IRTS) and now on deputation, working as Chairman and Managing Director of HLL Lifecare Limited (HLL) a Centre Public Sector Enterprise functioning under Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), Government of India. The case under dispute is related to HLL Biotech Limited (HBL), which was one of the subsidiary companies of HLL and now, a separate Centre Public Sector Enterprise. At the time of filing the case in C.C.No.101 of 2020 by Labour Enforcement Officer before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpet, the petiti
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict adherence to the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, particularly regarding the timeliness of compla....
The court quashed criminal proceedings due to improper cognizance and clarified limitation interpretation under the Contract Labour Act, emphasizing judicial scrutiny.
Criminal proceedings quashed due to lack of jurisdictional standing on limitations, necessary party omission, and vague allegations against the accused.
The liability of officers of a company under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 is contingent upon their involvement in the day-to-day affairs of the company, and the prosecutio....
The main legal point established is that under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, officers of a company can only be prosecuted if the company is made accused, and specific alle....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the determination of the applicability of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 to the petitioners' business operations, and ....
The main legal point established is that the time limit prescribed under section 27 of the Contract Labour Act for filing complaints related to offences under the Act must be adhered to, and the magi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
