SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 226

M. S. RAMESH, SUNDER MOHAN
Surendhiran – Appellant
Versus
State rep by the Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri – Respondent


Advocates appeared: For the Appellant :V. Perarasu, Amicus Curiae. For the Respondent: E. Raj Thilak, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to call for the records and to set aside the Judgment in S.C.No.37 of 2019 passed by the learned Sessions, Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri, dated 06.08.2021 and acquit the appellant/accused.)

JUDGMENT

Sunder Mohan, J.

1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the accused, challenging the conviction and sentence imposed upon him vide judgment dated 06.08.2021 in S.C.No.37 of 2019 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri.

2 (i) It is the case of the prosecution that the deceased was the mother of the accused; that the husband of the deceased owned certain lands in Thellabenda village; that there was a litigation initiated by third parties claiming right over the said property after the death of the husband of the deceased; that the litigation ended successfully in favour of the deceased; that the deceased and the accused were not in cordial terms; that the accused came to know that the deceased intended to sell the land to one Tr.Vijayan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top