BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
B. PUGALENDHI, J.
N. Rameshkumar and Another – Petitioners
Versus
The Chairman cum District Collector, Dindigul and Others – Respondents
W.P. (MD) Nos. 17568, 22285 of 2023, W.M.P. (MD) Nos. 18566 to 18568 of 2023
Decided On : 06-03-2024
Eucalyptus Trees - Environmental Conservation - Tamil Nadu Estate Abolition Act, 1949, Tamil Nadu Timber Transit Rules, 1968 - The court allowed the petitioners to cut and remove the Eucalyptus trees, which are injurious to the environment, without affecting the forest land. The petitioners have to manually transport the trees through the forest land and then use the available road for further transportation.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought permission to cut down Eucalyptus Grandis Trees in their patta land and transport them through forest land. The respondents objected, citing environmental concerns and lack of pathway rights.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Eucalyptus trees were invasive and harmful to the environment. It acknowledged the existence of pathways and allowed the petitioners to transport the trees while ensuring minimal impact on the environment.
Issues: Permission to cut and transport Eucalyptus trees, environmental impact, pathway rights, and forest land use.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the environmental impact of Eucalyptus trees, the existence of pathways, and the need to balance the petitioners' rights with environmental conservation.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioners to cut and remove the Eucalyptus trees, ensuring minimal impact on the forest land and environment.
ORDER :
Prayer in W.P. (MD) No. 17568/2023: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission to the petitioners to cut down the Eucalyptus Grandis Trees in the patta land of the petitioners in S. No. 592/1, 592/2 situated in Vadakavunji Village, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District and consequently, permit the petitioners to transport the same through the land in S. No. 12 situated in Vadakavunji Village, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District, measuring to an extent of 2 kms by considering the application of the petitioners dated 28.09.2022.
In W.P. (MD) No. 22285/2023: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order in C.P. No. 30/2022/C5 dated 01.09.2023 on the file of the first respondent, quash the same and further directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to cut down the Eucalyptus Grandis Trees in the patta land of the petitioners in S. No. 592/1 & 592/2 situated in Vadakavunji Village, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District and permit the petitioners to transport the same through the land in S. No. 12 situated in Vadakavunji Village, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District, measuring to an extent of 2 kms.
1. The petitioners are the owners of the land in S. Nos. 592/1, 592/2 in Vadakavunji Village, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District. The lands have been purchased by the petitioners in the year 2015. They have also obtained patta for the said lands. As on date, there are 1404 Eucalyptus Grandis Trees in these lands. The petitioners, with an intention to remove these trees and put some cultivation, sought permission from the first respondent/the Chairman of Hill Areas (Preservation of Trees) Committee on 28.09.2022.
2. The first respondent has not passed any orders in the said representation and therefore, the petitioners have approached this Court by way of W.P. (MD) No. 17568 of 2023 for a mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission to cut down the Eucalyptus Grandis Trees from their patta land and for a consequential direction to permit them to transport the same through the land in S. No. 12, by considering their representation dated 28.09.2022.
3. The second respondent is having serious objections that the petitioners’ lands are classified as assessed tharisu lands, surrounded by S. No. 12, which belongs to Forest Department and that there is no right of pathway for the petitioners inside the forest land. The second respondent further stated that the land in S. No. 12 is a part and parcel of Vadakavunji Village, which was an ex-jamin village, taken over by the Government on 09.12.1950 under the Tamil Nadu Estate Abolition Act, 1949, vide G.O.MS. No. 3157, Revenue Department, dated 09.12.1950 and was transferred to Forest Department on 01.07.1951 vide G.O.MS. No. 1416, Revenue Department, dated 02.06.1951. There are six or seven streams inside Survey No. 12 and that grant of a right of pathway will create disturbances to the animals and animal habitats. As such, construction of any road to the field would affect the natural stream and it would be an offence. It is also stated that these lands are coming under the purview of eco-sensitive zone and there is a prohibition and non forest activities to safeguard the environment and therefore, there is no possibility of providing a pathway within the eco-sensitive zone.
4. When the matter came up for hearing on 04.09.2023, it is represented by the petitioners’ Counsel that a ghat road is available. However, the respondents refuted the same that there is no road at all. But, the petitioners’ Counsel produced a video clipping showing the pathway. Therefore, this Court, by order dated 04.09.2023, appointed an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the site and to ascertain as to whether any ghat road is available, as claimed by the petitioners. The Ad
Balancing property rights with environmental conservation and the impact of invasive species on the environment.
The court upheld the legality of cultivating eucalyptus trees on temple land, finding no substantial evidence of ecological harm and confirming compliance with statutory permissions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that landowners have the right to cut and transport trees from their private land in accordance with the state legislations, especially in the abse....
The central legal principle established in the judgment is the importance of protecting trees for environmental benefits and the regulation of tree felling and disposal on Government lands.
When a specific online portal and procedure under a government order exists for seeking permission to cut trees, the petitioner is required to adhere to that protocol rather than relying on a general....
The court mandates timely consideration of a pending representation under Article 226, emphasizing procedural compliance by authorities.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.