IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
Munusamy and Another – Appellants
Versus
The Assistance Commissioner of Police, Thiruvallur and Others – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 1639 of 2023, Criminal Appeal Nos. 35, 37, 38, 169 of 2024
Decided On : 25-03-2024
SC/ST Act - Bail Application - SC/SCT Act 1989 - Section 14(A)(2)
Fact of the Case:
The appellants filed a bail application under Section 14(A)(2) of SC/SCT Act 1989 to set aside the order passed by the Court of the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Thiruvallur and enlarge the appellants on bail pending trial in SC No. 165 of 2023 connected with Crime No. 77 of 2023.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution had not disclosed the inclusion of SC/ST Act and alteration of charge in earlier bail applications. The court also noted the details of the case, including the brutal murder and the status of the investigation and charge sheet.
Issues: The issues included the suppression of facts by the prosecution, the absence of notice to the victim in earlier bail applications, and the delay in serving summons to the accused as per the SC/ST Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the prosecution's failure to disclose the inclusion of SC/ST Act and the details of the case in earlier bail applications, leading to the grant of bail to the appellants with specific conditions.
Final Decision: The impugned orders in Crl. M.P. Nos. 6261, 6267, 6260, 5399 and 6260 of 2023 dated 22.12.2023 were set aside, and the Criminal Appeals were allowed, granting bail to the appellants with specific conditions.
JUDGMENT :
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 14(A)(2) of SC/SCT Act 1989 to set aside the order passed by the Court of the Principal District and Sessions Judge at, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District, in Crl. M.P. No. 6261 of 2023 dated 22.12.2023 and enlarge the appellant on bail pending trial in SC No. 165 of 2023 on the file of the Court of the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District connected with Crime No. 77 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police.
1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the order in Crl. M.P. Nos. 6261, 6267, 6260, 5399 and 6260 of 2023 dated 22.12.2023 passed by the Court of the Principal District and Sessions Judge at, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District, and enlarge the appellants on bail pending trial in SC No. 165 of 2023 on the file of the Court of the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District connected with Crime No. 77 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police.
2. This Court, on 07.03.2024, had passed the following order:
2. The contention of the learned counsel for appellants is that the assailants and other accused, who are similarly placed to the appellants in this case have been granted bail by the Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur in C.M.P. No. 3562 of 2023 for A3/Dinesh, A5/Guna, A6/Anandan on 10.08.2023. In that the third respondent/de-facto complainant had appeared and made her objection and thereafter only bail was granted. Similarly, A13/Purushothaman @ Settu, A14/Reegan, A15/Selvaganapathi and A20/Prabhu were granted bail by this Court in Crl. O.P. No. 19925 of 2023 on 07.09.2023. Similarly, A21/Veera @ Veerabathran was granted bail by this Court in Crl. O.P. No. 20546 of 2023 on 03.10.2023. A10/Rajkumar and A16/Prasanth were granted bail by this Court in Crl. O.P. No. 28858 of 2023 and A7/Raghuman was granted bail by this Court in Crl. O.P. No. 495 of 2024 on 12.01.2024.
3. The case projected against the petitioners/accused is that when the deceased in this case was travelling in his car near the Nazarethpet junction, two cars followed the deceased. One car intercepted and dashed against the car of the deceased and thereafter thrown the country bomb over the deceased and the deceased got down from the car and ran away for few meters. He was chased and attacked by the assailants all over the body and done to death. As regards A1, there was some business rivalry in the scrap business and hence, he is said to have planned, executed murder in connivance with the other accused. The other accused, who are before this Court, are only car driver of one of the Xylo car and some had participated in preparation of the country bomb and some had given confidence to the accused and they have got no other specific overt act with regard to the attack of the deceased. They have been in custody for more than 10 months. Now investigation completed, charge sheet filed in S.C. No. 165 of 2023, which is pending trial. For the purpose of effectively defending the case they prayed that bail to be granted. A8, A17 and A18 have no specific overt act. With regard to A7, it is stated that he ran over the deceased. A2 along with A12 and A19 prepared the country bomb and A4 is said to have thrown the country bomb on the deceased and A11 thrown country bomb on the car. A12 is the person, who had driven the Xylo car, intercepted and dashed against the car of the dec
The prosecution's duty to disclose the inclusion of SC/ST Act and the details of the case in bail applications, and the court's discretion to grant bail with specific conditions.
The key legal principle established in the judgment is that the decision to grant bail should consider the presence of the accused at the scene of occurrence, the actions taken in similar cases, and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the accused's entitlement to statutory bail if the charge sheet is not filed within the specified period, emphasizing the importance of personal li....
It is the duty vested with the prosecution to establish the guilt against the accused by facilitating worthwhile evidence to secure conviction. But all the materials secured by the I.O. require to be....
Breach of bail conditions warrants cancellation of bail and dismissal of discharge applications; compliance is mandatory to ensure judicial integrity.
The main legal point established is that the decision to grant bail in cases involving serious charges and potential witness tampering or absconding should consider factors such as the accused's ante....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.