Karuppachamy S/o. Aandi vs State - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 3310

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3310

M. SUNDAR, R. SAKTHIVEL
Karuppachamy S/o. Aandi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.T.J.Ebenezer Charles for Mr.L.Prabhu
For the Respondent: Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the 'appellant/ accused' [henceforth 'accused' for the sake of brevity] assailing the 'Judgment dated February 25th, 2022' [henceforth 'impugned Judgment' for the sake of clarity] passed by 'The Fast Track Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram' [henceforth 'Trial Court' for the sake of brevity] in Sessions Case No.32 of 2018 in which the accused was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 450 and 376(2)(m) of 'The Indian Penal Code' 1860 (Act No.45 of 1860) [henceforth 'IPC' for the sake of brevity] and sentenced as follows:

Offence u/s.	Sentence
Section 450 of IPC	To undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default thereof, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a further period of 1 year.
Section 376(2)(m) of IPC	To undergo Imprisonment for Life i.e., for remainder of the accused’s natural life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default thereof, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a further period of 2 years.
Note: The period of imprisonment already undergone was ordered to be set off under Section 428 of Criminal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3310

M. SUNDAR, R. SAKTHIVELKaruppachamy S/o. Aandi – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

M. SUNDAR, R. SAKTHIVEL
Karuppachamy S/o. Aandi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent