Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Perumal – Appellant
Versus
Uma – Respondent
ORDER :
S.M. Subramaniam, J.
[PRAYER: Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, pleased to punish the respondents for the willful disobedience of the orders of this Court passed in W.P.No.23673 of 2023 dated 11.08.2023 under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act.]
The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.23673 of 2023 dated 11.08.2023 has been complied with. Thus, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken.
2. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs.
Compliance with a court order negates the basis for a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Compliance with a court order negates the basis for a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
A contempt petition may be rendered moot by subsequent orders that alter the obligations imposed by earlier court rulings.
Compliance with court orders is essential; acknowledgment of compliance by both parties leads to closure of contempt petitions.
Compliance with court orders is essential, and actions taken in response to such orders can negate claims of contempt.
Compliance with court orders as a fundamental obligation under contempt law is upheld.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
