SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 632

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, K.RAJASEKAR
S.Ravindran – Appellant
Versus
J. Kumaragurubaran, I.A.S. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.M. Elumalai
For the Respondent: Mr. D.B.R. Prabhu Standing Counsel

Table of Content
1. petition filed for contempt due to non-compliance with court orders. (Para 1)
2. compliance with court order confirmed by both parties. (Para 2)
3. contempt petition closed, no costs ordered. (Para 3)

ORDER :

S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.

The Contempt Petition has been filed for punishing the respondents for having not obeyed the orders of this Court dated 27.03.2025 made in W.P.No.10959 of 2025.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents, submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with. The said submission has been affirmed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Recording the above submissions, this Contempt Petition is closed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top