Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
S. Parimalam – Appellant
Versus
S. Vishagan – Respondent
ORDER :
S.M. Subramaniam, J.
[PRAYER: Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, pleased to punish the respondents for committing contempt of the Court by wilfully disobeying the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.13531 of 2019, dated 01.12.2022.]
The learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. Thus, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs.
Compliance with a court order negates the basis for a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Compliance with a court order negates the basis for a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Compliance with a court order negates the basis for a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act.
A contempt petition may be rendered moot by subsequent orders that alter the obligations imposed by earlier court rulings.
Compliance with court orders is essential; acknowledgment of compliance by both parties leads to closure of contempt petitions.
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 does not provide a basis for contempt proceedings based on the non-implementation of civil court orders.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
