Back
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
R. Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector (PD Section), Madurai – Respondent
ORDER :
Abdul Quddhose, J.
[PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the respondent in connection with the impugned order of rejection passed by him vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.25152/2016/R.D.2 dated 29.12.2017 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to revise the petitioner's pay in the cadre of Special Grade by extending the benefit of the G.O.Ms.No.237 Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 22.07.2013 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.]
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking revision of pay on the ground that the respondent ought to have granted Special Grade to the petitioner and to revise his pay by extending the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.237 Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 22.07.2013.
2. According to the petitioner, under the impugned order dated 29.12.2017, without adhering to the principles of natural justice, the petitioner's request for revision of pay has been rejected.
3. It is now brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respon
The court established that pending related appeals must be resolved before considering new petitions for relief, ensuring adherence to legal principles.
The main legal point established is that relief such as selection grade and special grade should be sought within a reasonable period of time, and lack of diligent pursuit of representations during s....
Erroneous fixation of pay or pension can be corrected, but recovery after retirement causing hardship is not sustainable without evidence of misrepresentation or written undertakings.
The cancellation of the government letter and the application of FR 22(1) a(i) and FR 22-B in fixing pay for police personnel were central to the court's decision.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of judicial review in matters of pay refixation, emphasizing the technical nature of pay fixation and the requirement for expert ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Government Letter dated 24.08.2007, its subsequent cancellation, and the non-est nature of the impugned orders based on t....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the application and interpretation of Government Order No.25 P & AR Department dated 23.03.2015 to rectify pay anomalies between seniors and ju....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
