SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1319

L. NAGESWARA RAO, B. R. GAVAI
Nitish Shankar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Suchitra Pandey, Advocate, Ms. Shomila Bakshi, Advocate, For the Appellant.

ORDER

1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the High Court by filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, if so advised.

2. Permission granted.

3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top