S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
M. Bharathkumar – Appellant
Versus
Deputy General Manager (B&O), Appellate Authority, State Bank of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C. KUMARAPPAN, J.
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 15.09.2021 passed in W.P. No. 10081 of 2017 and consequently, to direct the respondents to reinstate the appellant in service with full back wages, continuity of service and all other attended benefits.
1. The writ petitioner is the appellant. He filed a writ petition to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records dated 22.02.2017 of the first respondent, by and in which the writ petitioner was dismissed from service.
2. The necessary facts which are require for the proper adjudication of the appeal is as follows:
(b) On receipt of the above Charge Memorandum, the petitioner submitted his explanation on 16.09.2015. Not satisfying with the same, t
B.C. Chaturvedi Vs. Union of India and others
Deputy General Manager (Appellate Authority) and others Vs. Ajai Kumar Srivastava
General Manager (Operations), State Bank of India and another Vs. R. Periyasamy
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Vs. Shashikant S. Patil and another
Indian Overseas Bank Vs. Indian Overseas Bank Officers'' Association and another
Joy Aich Vs. Chairman & Managing Director
Prem Nath Bali Vs. Registrar, High Court of Delhi and another
Principal Secretary, Govt. of A.P. Vs. M. Adinarayan
Ravinder Kumar Dhariwal and Another Vs. Union of India and others
State Bank of India and others Vs. Narendra Kumar Pandey
State Bank of India Vs. Jah Developers Private Limited and others
Judicial review in disciplinary matters is limited to ensuring fair treatment and adherence to natural justice, not to reassess the merits of the disciplinary authority's conclusions.
The main legal point established is the scope of judicial review in departmental enquiry proceedings, emphasizing the principles of natural justice, the authority of the disciplinary officers, and th....
Judicial review of disciplinary actions is limited; courts cannot reappraise evidence or substitute their judgment unless findings are arbitrary or unsupported by evidence.
The standard of proof in disciplinary proceedings is based on preponderance of probabilities, and the court does not reappraise evidence unless there is a violation of natural justice.
The power of judicial review, of the Constitutional Courts, is an evaluation of the decision-making process and not the merits of the decision itself. It is to ensure fairness in treatment and not to....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.