IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, N.SENTHILKUMAR, JJ.
The District Collector - Appellant
Versus
Kongu Nattu Vellalar Trust – Respondent
W.A.No.660 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.3448 of 2021
Decided on : 05-07-2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, N.SENTHILKUMAR, JJ.
The District Collector - Appellant
Versus
Kongu Nattu Vellalar Trust – Respondent
W.A.No.660 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.3448 of 2021
Decided on : 05-07-2024
Writ Appeal - Construction Permission - Revenue Standing Order 26 Clause 13 - The court interpreted the provisions regarding Government Poramboke land and temple poramboke, emphasizing the state's ownership and the limitations on claims of title by private entities, influencing the decision to allow the District Collector's appeal.
Fact of the Case:
The District Collector appealed against a writ order allowing the construction of a Siddha Hospital on Government Poramboke land claimed by a community for temple purposes, arguing that the land was needed for public use.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the land was classified as Government Poramboke and that the community had not established ownership, thus allowing the District Collector to utilize the land for public purposes.
Issues: Whether the community could claim ownership over Government Poramboke land and if the District Collector's rejection of the construction proposal was justified.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the state retains ownership of Government Poramboke land and that the community's claims did not establish legal title, allowing the government to repurpose the land for public use.
Result: The writ order was set aside, and the Writ Appeal was allowed.
JUDGMENT :
[Judgment was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 08.03.2019 made in W.P.No.4567 of 2012 and allow this writ appeal.
The writ order dated 08.03.2019 passed in W.P.No.4267 of 2012 is sought to be assailed in the present writ appeal.
2. The District Collector, Namakkal is the appellant. The respondent has instituted a writ petitioner seeking sanction/permission for construction of Siddha Hospital in the temple land in S.No.33/2, Annaikattipalayam, Koonavellampatti Village, Rasipuram Village, Namakkal District. The Writ Court set aside the rejection order and directed the respondent therein to grant sanction/permission for construction of a Siddha Hospital. Aggrieved by the said direction, the District Collector preferred the present writ appeal.
3. Mr.R.Ramanlaal, learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that the land measuring 4.27 acres in S.No.33/2 is classified as Government Poramboke in revenue records. No doubt, Kongu Nattu Vellalar Community people of that area constructed a temple and worshipping for several years. However, now they started claiming the entire 4.27 acres of land nearby the temple. It is a valuable land and the Government has proposed to utilise the land for various public purposes. Thus, an action was initiated. The learned Single Judge has not considered the fact that larger extent of land measuring 4.27 acres is a Government Poramboke land and the temple has been constructed in a small area. The Government has no proposal to take over the temple area, but decided to utilise the other areas for public purposes. Thus, the District Collector has chosen to file the present writ appeal.
4. To substantiate the claim, the learned Additional Advocate General furnished the original 'A'-Register, which would reveal that the classification has been entered as “Government Poramboke”. In Column No.12 it is mentioned as “Vinayagar Temple”. Therefore, the Vinayagar Temple has been constructed in the Government Poramboke land and the people of Kongu Nattu Vellalar Community is worshipping the temple for several years. The original Filed Measurement Book (FMB) sketch of Anaikattupalayam Village, Rasipuram Taluk also has been produced. The FMB sketch would indicate that in the larger extent of Government Poramboke land, Vinayagar Temple has been constructed in a small portion. Relying on the original A Register and FMB records, the learned Additional Advocate General would submit that the Writ Court has granted permission, which is not in consonance with the revenue records including FMB sketch.
5. Ms.Anu Ganesan, learned counsel for the respondent would oppose by stating that the temple has been constructed by Kongu Nattu Vellalar Community people three hundred years back. They are utilising the land for various temple related purposes. They are running Siddha Hospital for benefit of the people of that locality. They are doing several charitable activities and the land is under the control of the temple authorities. Therefore, the writ order granting permission is in accordance with law and the writ appeal is to be rejected.
6. The Writ Court while considering the issues recorded the counter statement filed by the District Collector, which reads as under;
“4. ................It was stated that an enquiry was conducted as directed on 21.11.2007. It was stated that the proposed construction of Siddha hospital was not permitted and an order was also passed on 03.12.2007. It was stated that the petitioner trust was found only for the sake of Kongu Nattu Gounder community. It was further stated that the Panchayat was not the competent authority to grant permission for construction of temple. It was further stated that there was already a Siddha wing in the Government Head Quarters Hospital, Rasipuram. There were also three Primary Health Centres functioning to the cater to the needs of the pu
AI
The state retains ownership of Government Poramboke land, and claims of title by private entities must be substantiated by legal documentation.
Temple land classified as Poramboke cannot be utilized for purposes detrimental to the temple's interests without proper consultation, ensuring procedural fairness in administrative decisions.
Transfer of temple land requires prior permission from the HR & CE Commissioner, and failure to notify the temple violates natural justice.
The Court reaffirmed that temple lands and funds must only be used for religious purposes, asserting the government's lack of authority to misuse such properties under the Hindu Religious and Charita....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.