BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
M. Nagarajan - Petitioner
Versus
The District Collector, Thenkasi District, Thenkasi and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(MD)No.18016 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.13162 and 13163 of 2022
Decided On : 07-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to construction order based on land usage. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's objections to land allocation and temple rights. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of land classification and rights. (Para 4 , 7 , 11) |
| 4. legal precedent on temple land usage rights. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. order to cease construction and restore land to temple. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER :
(G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.)
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the work order issued by the 4th respondent dated 06.12.2021 to construct modern gasifier crematorium at Tirunelveli Road to Nedunkulam Road at Sankarankovil Municipality.
2.On the request made by the general public of Sankarankovil Municipality to construct electric crematorium, the Government issued G.O.(Ms)No.90, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (NS) Department, dated 27.10.2021 and allotted funds to implement the crematorium projects in 7 Municipalities, including Sankarankovil Municipality at the cost of Rs.1,045 lakhs. Accordingly, tender was floated, in which highest bidder, namely, M/s. PSR Constructions was selected and work order dated 06.12.2021 was issued to them. As per the work order, now, construction of electric crematorium is under progress.
3.It is the contention of the petitioner that the land, which is chosen by the respondents 4 and 5 herein, belongs to the 3rd respondent temple and adjacent to the said land, Arulmigu Aruvam Soodiya Vinayagar Temple is situated abutting to Sankarankovil to Tirunelveli Main Road and the said temple is being used by the devotees, who are pilgrimage for various places in Tirunelveli and Thoothukudi District. Therefore, even before issuance of the work order, the petitioner submitted representation by way of objections to construct electric crematorium in the place to the 4th respondent. However, the same was not considered by the 4th respondent. Therefore, the petitioner approached this Court by filing Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.6262 of 2022, wherein this Court, by order dated 05.04.2022, directed the 4th respondent to consider the objections raised by the petitioner and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law. However, the 4th respondent has not considered the objections raised by the petitioner and now, it is half way through of construction of electric crematorium.
4.On perusal of the tender notification as well as the work order, it is seen that the 4th respondent mentioned only the name of the work to be carried out ie., construction of modern gasifier crematorium at Tirunelveli road to Nedunkulam road at Sankarankovil Municipality and he did not even mention the particular place or the survey number, where the construction of electric crematorium is to be carried out.
5.The 4th respondent has filed counter affidavit, stating that the land comprised in S.No.888/3 to an extent of 0.32.0 ares is classified as 'Government Records', wherein there is a stone building, which belongs to Arulmigu Sankaranarayanar Thirukovil, Sankarankovil. The said land was used as threshing floor to an extent of 3808 sq.ft. Already, there was a crematorium and the 4th respondent is only upgrading and developing the same into a electric crematorium based on the request of the general public. That apart, this Writ Petition is filed without adding the person in whose name the work order was issued. Further, the petitioner is none other than the owner of the adjacent property and as such, he is not interested over the temple land.
6.The 3rd respondent has filed counter affidavit, stating that the lands comprised in old S.No.564/A5 new S.No.888/3 to an extent of 77 acres and 95 cents situated adjacent to Arulmigu Aruvam Soodiya Vinayagar Temple were dedicated to the service of the temple entrance and treasury watchman service attached to Arulmigu Sankaranarayanar Thirukovil, Sankarankovil vide T.D.No.194 and the temple is notified under Section 46(iii) of TAMIL NADU HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS ACT , 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 't
AI
Temple land classified as Poramboke cannot be utilized for purposes detrimental to the temple's interests without proper consultation, ensuring procedural fairness in administrative decisions.
Transfer of temple land requires prior permission from the HR & CE Commissioner, and failure to notify the temple violates natural justice.
The state retains ownership of Government Poramboke land, and claims of title by private entities must be substantiated by legal documentation.
Temple lands' unauthorized use by government without S.34 permission mandates compensation despite long delay, proven by ryotwari patta.
The Court reaffirmed that temple lands and funds must only be used for religious purposes, asserting the government's lack of authority to misuse such properties under the Hindu Religious and Charita....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.