SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1630

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
P. N. Vignesh – Appellant
Versus
Chairman and Members of the Bar Council, The Bar Council of India, 21, Rouse Avenue, Institutional Area, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Mohammed Fayaz Ali
For the Respondent: Mr.S.R.Raghunathan, Mr.E.K.Kumaresan, Mr.Srinath Sridevan, Senior Counsel, For Mr.Bharadwaja Ramasubramaniam

Judgement Key Points

The provided legal document is a judgment of the Madras High Court (not the Supreme Court) emphasizing the prohibition on advertising, solicitation, and commercialization of legal services by advocates and online intermediaries, as governed by the Advocates Act, 1961 (Sections 35 and 49), Bar Council of India Rules (Rules 36 and 37), and provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (including Section 79 and related intermediary guidelines). (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)

No Supreme Court judgments are referenced or discussed in the document. (!) [p_judgement_act_referred]


ORDER :

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to take appropriate action against respondents 3, 4 and 5 and any other service provider, restraining them from carrying on the business of providing legal services on their web portal or Applications.

The writ on hand has been filed as a “Pro Bono Publico” in the interest of legal profession. Certain professional misconducts are alleged in the writ petition against the “Online Service Providers”.

2. The core contention of the petitioner is that the respondents 3, 4 and 5 are providing online lawyer services on their respective Domains and Applications, wherein Advocates openly solicit Legal works.

3. Online Service Providers are providing various day to day needs and requirements of general public. Among other requirements such as plumbing services, carpentry services, salon at home, driver, sofa cleaning, maid, baby sitter, cook, the respondents 3, 4 and 5 also offering lawyer services.

4. Upon a search being made for a lawyer, various options are offered such as Property/RERA lawyers, corporate lawyers, consume

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
            whatsapp-icon Back to top