Back
R. SAKTHIVEL
Kamalam – Appellant
Versus
Palaniammal (Deceased) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R. SAKTHIVEL, J.
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 29.06.2007 made in A.S. No. 21 of 2007 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Namakkal confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 15.12.2006 made in R.E.A. No. 861 of 2005 in R.E.P. No. 354 of 2004 in O.S. No. 150 of 1997 on the file of Additional District Munsif, Namakkal.
1. The Second Appeal in S.A. No. 1227 of 2007 is directed against the judgment and decree dated June 29, 2007 passed in A.S. No. 21 of 2007 by the ‘Subordinate Court, Namakkal’ [henceforth ‘First Appellate Court’ for the sake of brevity], confirming the fair and decreetal order dated December 15, 2006 passed in R.E.A. No. 861 of 2005 in R.E.P. No. 354 of 2004 in O.S. No. 150 of 1997 by the Additional District Munsif, Namakkal [henceforth ‘Execution Court’ for the sake of brevity].
2. The Second Appeal in S.A. No. 1228 of 2007 is directed against the judgment and decree dated June 29, 2007 passed in A.S. No. 50 of 2005 by the First Appellate Court, confirming the judgment and decre
The court established that a partition decree does not bind minor coparceners not included in the suit, reinforcing the importance of their representation in legal proceedings.
The court affirmed that admissions made during trial are binding, and ancestral properties cannot be dismissed based on a registered Partition Deed that does not negate the rights of coparceners.
The court affirmed that items 1 and 2 of suit properties are ancestral, and items 3 to 11 are self-acquired, highlighting the plaintiffs' burden to prove family property claims.
Co-owners are presumed to be in constructive possession of property unless ouster is proven, impacting court fee valuation in partition suits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of evidence in establishing the nature of the suit property and the entitlement to seek relief by way of partition, as well as the i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that properties derived by the father through a partition deed are to be treated as his self-acquired properties, as per Section 8 of the Hindu Suc....
The court upheld the entitlement of the plaintiff's share in ancestral properties and directed the determination of her legal heirs and the validity of her Will before distribution.
A son born from a void marriage has rights to inheritance under amendments to the Hindu Succession Act, affirming equal status to legitimate and illegitimate children in claims for partition post the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
