SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1822

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.Subramaniam, C.Kumarappan, JJ.
S.Jayabharathi - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and
Administrative Reforms and ors.
W.P.No.28781 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.28070 & 28071 of 2022
Decided On : 10-06-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.H.Mary Sowmi Rexi For M/s.Issac Chambers
For the Respondent:Mr.R.Neelakandan Additional Advocate General, Mr.B.Vijay

IMPORTANT POINT
A completed recruitment process cannot be challenged unless there are legal violations in the appointment orders.

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Recruitment Notification - The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the recruitment notification for the post of Senior Bailiff, emphasizing that the recruitment process was completed and selected candidates were already appointed. The court allowed the petitioner to challenge the appointment orders if issued in violation of law, highlighting the principle that completed recruitment processes cannot be contested unless there are legal violations in the appointments.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to challenge Recruitment Notification No.159 of 2022 for various posts in the Subordinate Judicial Service in Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu, specifically concerning backlog vacancies for the post of Senior Bailiff under the Scheduled Caste (Arunthathiyars) category.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the recruitment process had been completed and selected candidates were already appointed and serving, rendering the challenge to the recruitment notification moot. The court stated that the petitioner could challenge the appointment orders if they were issued in violation of law.

Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the recruitment notification was maintainable given that the recruitment process had been completed and appointments made.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that once the recruitment process is completed and appointments are made, challenges to the recruitment notification itself are not maintainable unless there is a clear violation of law in the appointment process.

Result: The writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was granted liberty to challenge the appointment orders if necessary.

ORDER :

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned Notification No.159 of 2022 dated 24.07.2022 published by the 2nd respondent, quash the same in so far as the backlog vacancy for the post of Senior Bailiff under Scheduled Caste (Arunthathiyars) – W/DW – Priority category notified therein.

The writ petition has been instituted challenging the Recruitment Notification No.159 of 2022 dated 24.07.2022 for recruitment to the post of Examiner, Reader, Senior Bailiff and Xerox Operator in Subordinate Judicial Service for the Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu.

2. Admittedly, the recruitment process had been completed and selected candidates were appointed and serving. Therefore, the writ petition deserves no further adjudication, since the challenge made is the recruitment-notification. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the appointment orders, if it had been issued in violation of law.

3. With this liberty, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top