SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2178

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, M. JOTHIRAMAN, JJ.
Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Chennai Range and Anr. - Respondents
W.P.No.38866 of 2024
Decided On : 07-01-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. S. Nadhiya
For the Respondents: Mr. R. Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor.

The court can grant leave to a convict prisoner based on favorable recommendations from a Probation Officer, despite inaccuracies in the leave application.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus - The petitioner sought to quash the rejection of a leave application for a convict prisoner, which was denied based on incorrect reasons stated in the application. The Probation Officer's report contradicted the petitioner's claims, yet the court noted satisfactory conduct of the prisoner. The court exercised its powers under Article 226 to grant leave. (Paras 2-4)

(B) Leave Application - The court emphasized the importance of accurate information in leave applications and the role of the Probation Officer's recommendations in the decision-making process. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the rejection of a leave application for his brother, a convict prisoner, who had been imprisoned for 8 years. The rejection was based on incorrect reasons stated in the application, as found by the Probation Officer.

Findings of Court:
The court granted 21 days of ordinary leave to the convict prisoner, acknowledging the Probation Officer's favorable recommendation despite the initial rejection.

Issues: The main issue was whether the leave application was justified based on the reasons provided and the conduct of the prisoner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Probation Officer's report, which found the petitioner's reasons incorrect, was significant, but the satisfactory conduct of the prisoner warranted the granting of leave.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

ORDER :

(M. Jothiraman, J.)

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in the order date on 23.11.2024 bearing No. 92853/ tha.ku.3/ 2024 passed by respondent No.2 and quashing the same, and directing the respondents to grant 28 days ordinary leave for the petitioner's brother Arulmurugan, S/o.Periyanna aged about 32 years, Convict Prisoner, Convict No.733, Central Prison, Salem.)

The rejection of the leave application by Superintendent of Prison in proceedings No. 92853/ tha.ku.3/ 2024 dated 23.11.2024, is sought to be assailed in the present writ proceedings.

2. The prisoner is in actual imprisonment for about 8 years. The leave application was rejected on the ground that reason stated in the application is found incorrect by the Probation Officer.

3. The Probation Officer, in his report, has stated that the reasons assigned by the petitioner for grant of leave is incorrect. On enquiry, the Probation Officer found that the mother of the prisoner is not taking any treatment as stated in the leave application. However, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the conduct of the prisoner inside the prison was found to be satisfactory by the prison authorities.

4. In view of the favourable recommendation of the Probation Officer, we are inclined to invoke our powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, thereby granting required leave to the convict prisoner herein.

5. At this juncture, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the convict prisoner herein is eligible to avail only 21 days of ordinary leave.

6. Accordingly, the convict prisoner viz., Arulmurugan, S/o.Periyanna aged about 32 years, Convict Prisoner, Convict No.733, Central Prison, Salem., is hereby granted ordinary leave for a period of 21 days, without escort commencing from 11.01.2025 on the following conditions.

    (i) Respondents are directed to release the Convict Prisoner viz., Arulmurugan, S/o.Periyanna aged about 32 years, Convict Prisoner, Convict No.733, Central Prison, Salem on Ordinary Leave for a period of 21 days i.e., from 11.01.2025 to 31.01.2025.

    (ii) The Convict Prisoner shall be released on 11.01.2025 at 10.00 am and surrender before the Central Prison, Salem on 31.01.2025 at 05.00 p.m.

    (iii) The Convict Prisoner is directed to report before the Inspector of Police, Anadanapatti Police Station, Salem District twice in a week on Monday and Thursday at 10.30 a.m., during the period of leave.

    (iv) The Convict Prisoner shall utilize the leave only for the ground on which it has been granted and shall not indulge in any other activities.

7. Accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed. No Costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top