Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED, J
V.Mercy Ratnabai – Appellant
Versus
M.Sivakumar, Chief Educational Officer – Respondent
ORDER
This is a petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the Respondent for violation of the order, dated 17.10.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.13929 of 2018.
2. Heard Mr.A.Ajithgeethan, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.F.Deepak, learned Special Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent.
3. When the matter was taken up on 07.04.2025, this Court passed the following order:
“2. Mr.A.Ajithgeethan, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the post of Pre-vocational Instructor (Weaving) is a sanctioned post in the Respondent Institution and the approval to the appointment of the Petitioner was rejected by the District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli through the order dated 08.01.2018. Aggrieved by the respondents' action, the petitioner has filed a Writ Petition in W.P.(MD) No. 13929 of 2018 and the learned Single Judge of this Court vide order dated 17.10.2024 allowed the aforementioned Writ Petition. For better appreciation, the relevant portion of the order is reproduced below:
“7. Since the law is now well settled that the Pre-Vocational Instructor (Weaving) post is a Sanctioned post and the conversion of the Pre- Voca
Compliance with court orders is essential, and failure to do so may lead to contempt proceedings, which can be dropped upon fulfillment of the order.
Compliance with court orders is essential, and failure to do so may lead to contempt proceedings, as emphasized by the court's directive for timely disbursement of benefits.
Compliance with court orders is essential, and failure to comply may lead to contempt proceedings; the respondent must ensure the petitioner receives due benefits.
Court reaffirmed the necessity of compliance with judicial orders, emphasizing that non-compliance can lead to contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act.
Compliance with court orders is mandatory, and failure to adhere can lead to contempt proceedings as ruled in the present case.
Willful disobedience of a court order constitutes contempt of court, and the sincerity of an apology in contempt cases is crucial in determining its acceptance.
Court emphasized the necessity of compliance with judicial orders, ruling that willful disobedience constitutes contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Compliance with court orders, once established, mitigates contempt proceedings, reaffirming the importance of procedural respect by public authorities.
Non-compliance with court orders constitutes contempt, but fulfillment of directives leads to discharge from contempt proceedings.
The court found no grounds for contempt as the government complied with orders despite delays, emphasizing compliance assessment only.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
